2014
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.170687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Price and Non-Price Conservation Programs on Residential Water Demand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. Despite the efficacy of enforcement(Asci & Borisova, 2014;West et al, 2021), and Significant at p < .05. **Significant at p < .01.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. Despite the efficacy of enforcement(Asci & Borisova, 2014;West et al, 2021), and Significant at p < .05. **Significant at p < .01.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Intensifying water scarcity has led to a greater use of irrigation restrictions in various regions to achieve conservation goals (Barnes et al, 2021). This approach to conservation is used in the state of Florida, as well as many locations throughout the country (Asci & Borisova, 2014), including but not limited to California, Arizona, Nevada, and Texas (AWE, 2020). It is worth noting that many United States locations use only drought-triggered irrigation restrictions (AWE, 2020) which contrasts with most of Florida being under year-round irrigation restrictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%