2022
DOI: 10.1177/10812865221124142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of pore sizes on the elastic behaviour of open-porous cellular materials

Abstract: The influence of the pore structure characteristics in open-porous cellular materials on their macroscopic elastic behaviour is investigated by considering three important microstructural features viz. the relative density, the pore-size distribution, and the pore-wall thickness. To this end, a microstructure-informed modelling approach is presented, where all elements of the three-dimensional (3-d) pore structure can be controlled effectively. The results show that while density does dictate the mechanical pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

6
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Young's modulus E should vary with the relative density in a simple power law fashion E ∝ ρ 2 and the plastic rupture strength σ cr should depend on the density in a similar way, namely σ cr ∝ ρ 3/2 . While recent investigations have asserted the importance of the pore-size distributions and pore-wall morphology, alongside the relative density, in dictating the mechanical properties of such materials [2], the scaling relations still hold true for a vast majority of open-porous materials. This is a consequence of the models proposed by Gibson and Ashby, which work fine because many porous materials exhibit a cellular structure with walls of constant cross section, and in open-porous materials the edges of the pores, the struts, and beams can be described as smooth quadratic bars or cylinders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Young's modulus E should vary with the relative density in a simple power law fashion E ∝ ρ 2 and the plastic rupture strength σ cr should depend on the density in a similar way, namely σ cr ∝ ρ 3/2 . While recent investigations have asserted the importance of the pore-size distributions and pore-wall morphology, alongside the relative density, in dictating the mechanical properties of such materials [2], the scaling relations still hold true for a vast majority of open-porous materials. This is a consequence of the models proposed by Gibson and Ashby, which work fine because many porous materials exhibit a cellular structure with walls of constant cross section, and in open-porous materials the edges of the pores, the struts, and beams can be described as smooth quadratic bars or cylinders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In aerogels, the pore sizes range from a few ten nanometers to even micrometers, and the struts are, for instance, in the case of silica and Resorcinol-Formaldehyde (RF)-aerogels, better described as a pearl-necklace structure as shown with a lot of scanning electron micrograph (SEM) pictures in the book of Ratke and Gurikov [3]. While recent models have tackled the subject of pore-size or cell-size distributions in such materials [2,4], the effect of network connectivity and the effect of this pearl-necklace-like morphology remains less addressed. Some newer models described the mechanical properties of aerogels with twodimensional (2D) or 3D pore model of constant cross-section [5][6][7] taking also into account network defects, like dead ends, dangling beams, and struts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was recently illustrated that it is not only the density, but also the pore sizes and the pore‐wall morphology that dictate the mechanical properties in aerogels. [ 97 ] This was shown by applying the above‐mentioned radical Voronoi models, thus demonstrating the capabilities of the modeling approach to (a) design aerogel networks and (b) investigate the structure‐property relations.…”
Section: Fibrillar Aerogelsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…[46] Figure 5b illustrates the cases of aerogels from different polysaccharide sources. [24] The reason of these differences is different network connectivity, pores size, and pore wall morphology (see, for example, [47] ). Low density, fine morphology, and high specific surface area make all types of aerogels very promising for various applications.…”
Section: (C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 46 ] Figure 5b illustrates the cases of aerogels from different polysaccharide sources. [ 24 ] The reason of these differences is different network connectivity, pores size, and pore wall morphology (see, for example, [ 47 ] ).…”
Section: Background On Aerogels: Inorganic Synthetic Polymer Bio‐aero...mentioning
confidence: 99%