1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0302-4598(98)00203-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of plasmid DNA sizes and other factors on electrotransformation of Escherichia coli JM109

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding transformation efficiency was 4660±341 transformants/μg DNA. We also found that the electroporation with the electric field strength of more than 14 kV/cm was apt to cause a number of complications, such as arcing and shortening of the electrical pulses, as reported by Szostková and Horáková .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The corresponding transformation efficiency was 4660±341 transformants/μg DNA. We also found that the electroporation with the electric field strength of more than 14 kV/cm was apt to cause a number of complications, such as arcing and shortening of the electrical pulses, as reported by Szostková and Horáková .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This prompted us to develop a functional conjugative system to introduce the vector into bifidobacteria, as conjugation has at least two important advantages over electroporation. First, electroporation efficiencies are known to decrease as the size of the vector increases (Szostková & Horakova, 1998). Conjugation does not have this limitation and has been successfully used to transfer entire genomes in E. coli (Isaacs et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two classical expressions of the transformation are used (Szostkova and Horakova, 1998). The efficiency of transformation is reflected by the number of transformants I Jlg of used DNA and the transformation frequency is calculated by the percentage of survival cells which have been transformed.…”
Section: Expression Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effect is observed in the total response in terms of number of cells electrotransformed. Many experiments appear to show that the transformation efficiency decreased with an increase in the size ofDNA, but a limit to this conclusion is that variation of the size is obtained by use of different plasmids with various antibiotic markers and origins (McLaughlin andFerretti, 1995, Szostkova andHorakova, 1998). This observation is not obvious when different plasmid sizes were obtained either by ligation of the same marker region in various plasmids or by successive deletion in a given plasmid (Allen andBlaschek, 1990, Ohse, et al, 1995).…”
Section: Effects Of Size and Molecular Form Of Dna And Plasmid Concenmentioning
confidence: 99%