2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.01.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of plant growth regulators on somaclonal variation in Cavendish banana (Musa AAA cv. ‘Zelig’)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
67
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5) mother plants of AAA groups were placed together and their regenerated somaclones were placed away from their parental cultivars, as somaclone 9 from 'Berangan Intan' and somaclone 17 from 'Berangan' showed least similarity meanwhile, somaclone 28 from 'Rastali' (AAB) showed least similarity to all other. From each dendrogram caused by BAP and TDZ, it could be concluded that regenerated somaclones by higher concentrations of both BAP and TDZ accumulated much genetic variation compared to control and lower concentrations of each BAP and TDZ which supports the earlier report in banana cultivars (Bairu et al, 2006) based on positive correlation between concentration of cytokinins and frequency of genetic variation. 8,9,10,16,17,18,19,25,26,27 and 28 are micropropagated somaclones of cultivars 'Berangan Intan', 'Berangan' and 'Rastali' respectively according to Table 2. …”
Section: Genetic Variability and Molecular Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5) mother plants of AAA groups were placed together and their regenerated somaclones were placed away from their parental cultivars, as somaclone 9 from 'Berangan Intan' and somaclone 17 from 'Berangan' showed least similarity meanwhile, somaclone 28 from 'Rastali' (AAB) showed least similarity to all other. From each dendrogram caused by BAP and TDZ, it could be concluded that regenerated somaclones by higher concentrations of both BAP and TDZ accumulated much genetic variation compared to control and lower concentrations of each BAP and TDZ which supports the earlier report in banana cultivars (Bairu et al, 2006) based on positive correlation between concentration of cytokinins and frequency of genetic variation. 8,9,10,16,17,18,19,25,26,27 and 28 are micropropagated somaclones of cultivars 'Berangan Intan', 'Berangan' and 'Rastali' respectively according to Table 2. …”
Section: Genetic Variability and Molecular Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This significant reduction in percentage of polymorphism reported by these authors could be due to the only one concentration of BAP applied in the medium in a way that this concentration has been previously approved as optimum BAP concentration for banana micropropagation (Kalimuthu et al, 2007;Venkatachalam et al, 2007;Bairu et al, 2008;and Shirani et al, 2009) The effect of BAP on genetic variation has been previously reported for other cultivars of banana (Bairu et al, 2006;Martin et al, 2006;Ray et al, 2006;EL-Dougdoug et al, 2007;Mohamed, 2007;and Sheidai et al, 2008). Bairu et al (2006) studied the correlation between multiplication rate and somaclonal variation, their results showed that treatments with high multiplication rate caused more variation. El-Dougdoug et al (2007) recorded 25% polymorphism among in vitro micropropagated banana which was closer to the findings reported in this study.…”
Section: Genetic Variability and Molecular Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, the tissue culture medium composition could be also responsible for the difference in global DNA methylation. Plant growth regulators may enhance in vitro induced variation resulting from epigenetic modifications (Nehra et al 1992;Bairu et al 2006). Study on Malus xiaojinensis revealed increased DNA methylation with increasing 2,4-D (Huang et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RAPD analysis used to evaluate genetic stability of several micropropagated crops (Farahani et al, 2011 andGoyal et al, 2015). Two important factors were found to affect genetic stability in micropropagation prosses; the subculture number and subculture interval (Etienne &Bertrand, 2003 andBairu et al, 2006). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%