2015
DOI: 10.14295/bds.2015.v18i1.1052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of piezosurgery with cvd tip in osteotomy in rat parietal bone: histologic and histomorphometric analysis

Abstract: <p><strong>Objective</strong>: The aim of this study was to compare the response of bone tissue in osteotomy under piezosurgery using a CVD tip in rat parietal bone in contrast with the standard protocol using low-speed tungsten burs. <strong>Material and Methods</strong>: A bone defect model was created in parietal bone of 20 male Wistar rats using CVD tip and drill. Five animals were sacrificed after 3, 7, 14 and 28 days and the bone containing the defects was submitted to the h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Burs/drills vs piezotomes: With moderate to strong evidence (EL: 1,3; Table 1) and consecutive substantial clinical impact piezotomes seem to provide an improved bonehealing, proved on molecular-biologic, micromorphologic and histologic level in vivo, when compared to rotary instruments. Furthermore, a superior soft-tissue-preservation is reported compared to drills and burs [70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86].…”
Section: Group 3 (Experimental Studies In Vivo)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burs/drills vs piezotomes: With moderate to strong evidence (EL: 1,3; Table 1) and consecutive substantial clinical impact piezotomes seem to provide an improved bonehealing, proved on molecular-biologic, micromorphologic and histologic level in vivo, when compared to rotary instruments. Furthermore, a superior soft-tissue-preservation is reported compared to drills and burs [70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86].…”
Section: Group 3 (Experimental Studies In Vivo)mentioning
confidence: 99%