2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11092-009-9085-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of perceived class mean on the evaluation of instruction

Abstract: A total of 232 college students in six different courses in three departments participated in a study to examine the effect of perceived course mean on course and instructor evaluations. Following a midsemester exam, students were given their actual earned exam scores and a manipulated class mean that was either ten percentage points higher or lower than the actual class average on the exam. Participants then completed an evaluation of the course and instructor. It was hypothesized that students scoring above … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another example can be found in a study to examine the effect of perceived course mean on course and instructor evaluations. Result shows that students scoring above the manipulated mean would rate the course and instructor more highly than students scoring below the manipulated mean (Norvilitis and Zhang, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example can be found in a study to examine the effect of perceived course mean on course and instructor evaluations. Result shows that students scoring above the manipulated mean would rate the course and instructor more highly than students scoring below the manipulated mean (Norvilitis and Zhang, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although students assign higher SET scores when they receive higher course grades, this effect is diminished by the fact that other students are not rewarded equally. Norvilitis and Zhang (2009) contradict this finding, concluding that students value classes that are easy for them, but they do not value classes that are easy for everyone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The Chinese students may be more context-oriented, which may help explain why Chinese students are less likely to commit fundamental attribution errors. Because of this, the reference and manipulation of a reference may play a more important role in forming and changing the Chinese students' judgments and evaluations, as indicated in an earlier study on the evaluation of instructors' performance (Norvilitis & Zhang, 2009). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students' ratings of an instructor were largely based on the scores they had obtained from the instructor in comparison with a perceived mean score manipulated by the instructor (Norvilitis & Zhang, 2009). A student's judgment and evaluation of an instructor's classroom performance is based on a reference-the student's test score in comparison with the mean score of the class.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%