1992
DOI: 10.1016/0956-7151(92)90205-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of particle size on the thermal conductivity of ZnS/diamond composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
188
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 356 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
188
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is especially so when there are several reported instances of significant changes in thermal conductivity in two-phase composites with volume fraction of the two phases, most notably in SiC/Al [29] and diamond/ZnS composites [30,31]. Although there is no detailed model for phonon scattering in multiple phase materials, one would expect that there would be two contributions to the thermal conductivity.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivity In Multiple Phase Compositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially so when there are several reported instances of significant changes in thermal conductivity in two-phase composites with volume fraction of the two phases, most notably in SiC/Al [29] and diamond/ZnS composites [30,31]. Although there is no detailed model for phonon scattering in multiple phase materials, one would expect that there would be two contributions to the thermal conductivity.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivity In Multiple Phase Compositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches generally assume conductive particles to be isolated in the matrix and take into account the thermal resistance in heat transfer between conductive particle and matrix, also known as Kapitza resistance, from the name of the discoverer of the temperature discontinuity at the metal-liquid interface. A very simple proof of thermal interfacial resistance is the fact that a thermal conductivity lower than the reference matrix was experimentally found with some composites containing particles with thermal conductivity higher than the matrix (Nan et al, 1997) and (Every et al, 1992). This phenomenon is explained by the very low efficiency of heat transfer between particles and matrix, so that the higher thermal conductivity of the filler cannot be taken into advantage and the composite behaves like a hollow material, thus reducing its conductivity compared to the dense reference matrix.…”
Section: Modeling Of Thermal Conductivity In Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to model thermal conductivity taking into account the interfacial thermal resistance between conductive particles and matrix have been reported by several research groups (Nan et al, 1997), (Every et al, 1992), (Dunn & Taya, 1993), (Lipton & Vernescu, 1996) and (Torquato & Rintoul, 1995) and applied particles with different geometries and topologies, including aligned continuous fibers, laminated flat plates, spheres, as well as disoriented ellipsoidal particles. In general, these models provided an improved fit with experimental data for ceramic based composites than models not accounting for interface thermal resistance.…”
Section: Modeling Of Thermal Conductivity In Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bruggeman assumed that the filler material particles were 7 added progressively to a composite matrix whose effective behavior is known at any given stage. Every et al [18] used Bruggeman's asymmetric model (BAM) for predicting the effective thermal conductivity of ZnS/Diamond composites. The deficiencies of using the BAM for predicting the composite thermal conductivity are described in [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%