2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-011-1943-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of oral and parenteral vitamin D supplementation in the elderly: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Abstract: Hypovitaminosis D in the elderly causes falls and fractures as a result of impaired neuromuscular functions and also may be a reason for nonspecific musculosceletal pain. The aim of this study is to investigate the benefits of a single dose per os or parenterally administrated vitamin D on increasing the quality of life and functional mobility and decreasing the pain in the elderly. The community-dwelling elderly subjects over 65 years age were included in the study. The subjects were given 300.000 IU Vitamin … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
1
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(13 reference statements)
2
47
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…[40][41][42][43] Another RCT assessing the effect of vitamin D supplementation on pain was published recently. 32 This trial among elderly Turkish patients (with or without vitamin D defi ciency) from a rheumatology outpatient clinic found improvement in pain 4 weeks after administration of a megadose of vitamin D. Regrettably, the authors do not report on the statistical signifi cance of the difference in change between the vitamin D and placebo groups.…”
Section: Determinantmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[40][41][42][43] Another RCT assessing the effect of vitamin D supplementation on pain was published recently. 32 This trial among elderly Turkish patients (with or without vitamin D defi ciency) from a rheumatology outpatient clinic found improvement in pain 4 weeks after administration of a megadose of vitamin D. Regrettably, the authors do not report on the statistical signifi cance of the difference in change between the vitamin D and placebo groups.…”
Section: Determinantmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…One trial did not fi nd a pain-relieving effect of vitamin D 3 (800 IU/d or 2 treatments with 10,000 IU) at 6 months in vitamin D-defi cient non-Western immigrants aged 18 to 65 years, the majority of whom had fi bromyalgia 31 ; however, this trial was not designed to evaluate the pain-modifying effect of vitamin D. The other trial was done in elderly Turkish patients from a rheumatology clinic (patients with fi bromyalgia were excluded) and found no differences in pain as assessed with a visual analogue scale 4 weeks after administration of 300,000 IU vitamin D (orally or intramuscularly) vs placebo. 32 We aimed to assess the effect of high-dose vitamin D supplementation on nonspecifi c musculoskeletal symptoms in non-Western vitamin D-defi cient immigrants.…”
Section: I Ta Min D F or Nonspecific Mus Culosk El E Ta L Pa Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings of a preoperative increased QoL score in the RP and GH domains resulting in an improved MCS score in the placebo group compared with the vitamin D group were against our a priori expectation of beneficial effects of vitamin D. In groups of patients without PHPT, low plasma 25OHD have also been associated with reduced QoL (24), and an RCT suggested improved QoL after vitamin D repletion (25). It is well known that PHPT is associated with a reduced QoL as measured by SF-36 (27), and may exert negative effects on neuronal function and synaptic plasticity (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Após a suplementação, o ganho médio estimado pelos autores nas concentrações séricas da 25(OH)D foi de 8,27 ng/mL, ganho semelhante aos descritos por Sakali et al, 18 mas inferiores aos descritos por Al-Zahrani et al 19 e menores do que cálculo sugerido por Maeda et al 8 de aumento de 0,7 a 1,0 ng/mL nas concentrações de 25(OH) D para cada 100 UI suplementada. Em termos absolutos, esses aumentos foram maiores nos voluntários com deficiência (81%), seguidos daqueles com insuficiência (32%) e aqueles com concentrações normais (15%).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified