The Effect of Office Design on Workstation Lighting: A Simulation Study

Abstract

It has long been recognised that the lit environment in open-plan office space is influenced by the density and properties of the installed furniture. Indeed, the Lumen Method includes a procedure involving look-up tables to account for the effects of workstation size, partition height, and partition reflectance on the mean working-plane illuminance. As part of a larger project on openplan office environments, we used the Lightscape TM simulation tool to further explore the effect of office design on the lit environment in workstations. The office design variables of interest were workstation size, partition height, workstation reflectance, ceiling reflectance, and ceiling height. In addition to desktop illuminance, our outcome variables included illuminance distribution and partition luminance. We performed simulations for combinations of these parameters for fourteen common lighting designs for North American open-plan office space, including direct prismatic and parabolic luminaires, and indirect and direct/indirect luminaires. The results are expressed in simple linear or curvilinear relationships between office design variables and luminous variables. Results follow expected trends, and are consistent with previously published work in this area. Furthermore, in going beyond mean desktop illuminance, our results extend knowledge of the relationships between office design variables and the luminous environment.

Risk factors for dissatisfaction with the indoor environment in open-plan offices: an analysis of COPE field study data

“…The effect of panel height is consistent with simulation studies showing that lower panel heights provide better access to daylight, and better distribution of electric light (Newsham and Sander, 2003; Reinhart, 2002). The effect of computer screen glare was also expected, given previous research and the widespread recommendations to avoid such conditions (IESNA, 2000; Veitch, 2001; Veitch and Newsham, 1998).…”

Relay-Assisted OFDM-Based Visible Light Communications

“…Therefore, a configuration which yields the maximum SNR would outperform the others. In our case, Configuration C is expected to yield the best performance among the three configurations under consideration since it yields the highest SNR based on (18). Similarly, among the floor light configurations, Configuration D gives the best performance and outperforms direct transmission by 1.65 dB.…”

“…Therefore, we have a total of 6 configurations as summarized in Table I. Reflection coefficients of the walls, ceiling, floor and desk surface are set at 0.8, 0.8, 0.3 and 0.8, respectively [18] [20]. For furniture items, i.e., chair, computer, the reflection coefficient is taken as 0.37 [21] assuming that they are both black colored.…”

“…Due to the negative exponential dependency, minimization of the BER in (14) is equivalent to the maximization of SNR in (18). Section II demonstrated that K L gives control over the illumination performance.…”

“…One of them is placed at the ceiling to provide ambient light to the environment and the other one might be either a desk or floor light used for task lighting purposes. The task lights are commonly used in office spaces and they give each user the ability to control their own lighting, reduce the glare, and lower their eye strain [18]. It is assumed that the main ambient light source at the ceiling has direct access to…”