1981
DOI: 10.1115/1.3241767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Nuclei on the Inception of Bubble and Sheet Cavitation on Axisymmetric Bodies

Abstract: Hydrogen bubbles were generated as cavitation nuclei and their distributions were measured. The number and size distribution of bubble cavities generated on axisymmetric bodies was calculated and compared with experimental results. The measured size distribution of bubble cavities agreed qualitatively with the calculated value, but the total number of cavities was about one half of the calculation. The role of stream nuclei on the inception of sheet cavity was investigated experimentally. Without added nuclei,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, over the years, several researchers (e.g. Kodama 1981, Kuiper 2010 have observed that the presence of free field nuclei affected significantly the repeatability of the experimental results. In experiments where nuclei count was very low the value of the incipient cavitation number showed large scatter, whereas in water rich in nuclei the results were more repeatable and were not affected by further addition of nuclei.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, over the years, several researchers (e.g. Kodama 1981, Kuiper 2010 have observed that the presence of free field nuclei affected significantly the repeatability of the experimental results. In experiments where nuclei count was very low the value of the incipient cavitation number showed large scatter, whereas in water rich in nuclei the results were more repeatable and were not affected by further addition of nuclei.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive research has been carried out on the topic over the years by numerous groups (see e.g. Harvey et al 1944;Fox & Herzfeld 1954;Apfel 1970;Kodama et al 1981;Atchley & Prosperetti 1989;Rood 1991;Meyer, Billet & Holl 1992;Milton & Arakeri 1992;Vinogradova et al 1995;Gindroz & Billet 1998;Liu & Brennen 1998;Arndt & Maines 2000;Mørch 2000;Hsiao, Chahine & Liu 2003). In the vast majority of engineering applications in which cavitation takes place, it can be argued that heterogeneous nucleation dominates, since all working fluids are expected to have a certain level of contamination and impurities.…”
Section: Bubble Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We notice that in most experimental studies the flow velocity and the dissolved gas content are not mentioned, and only rarely the dimensionless parameter of the thermodynamic effect Σ* is discussed. While the influence of dissolved gas content on cavitation inception [56], on lift/drag characteristics of a hydrofoil in the cavitating flow [57], and on cavitation damage [58] have been widely investigated, its effect on unsteady cavitation behavior at different degrees of thermodynamic effect still remains unclear. For the present study, a blow-down type tunnel was designed to operate with a constant content of dissolved gases (measured by dissolved oxygen, DO) and a constant temperature during each blow-down experiment.…”
Section: Please Cite This Article As Doi:101063/15116156mentioning
confidence: 99%