2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
430
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 443 publications
(438 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
430
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, in species with sex‐biased natal dispersal, our framework would predict that the dispersing sex should have a higher threshold to respond to maternal stress compared to the philopatric sex, given the reliability of the information about the future environment is lower in the dispersing sex (de Fraipont et al., 2000; Meylan & Clobert, 2005). This idea can be expanded to species with natal dispersal in general, and interestingly, to natal habitat preference induction, where dispersing individuals will select habitats that are most similar to their natal habitat (Davis & Stamps, 2004). This phenomenon would increase the match between the maternal and offspring environment and potentially reduce the cost of errors in offspring phenotype response.…”
Section: Predicting the Relative Strength Of Vertebrate Maternal‐strementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, in species with sex‐biased natal dispersal, our framework would predict that the dispersing sex should have a higher threshold to respond to maternal stress compared to the philopatric sex, given the reliability of the information about the future environment is lower in the dispersing sex (de Fraipont et al., 2000; Meylan & Clobert, 2005). This idea can be expanded to species with natal dispersal in general, and interestingly, to natal habitat preference induction, where dispersing individuals will select habitats that are most similar to their natal habitat (Davis & Stamps, 2004). This phenomenon would increase the match between the maternal and offspring environment and potentially reduce the cost of errors in offspring phenotype response.…”
Section: Predicting the Relative Strength Of Vertebrate Maternal‐strementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental and empirical studies on a diverse array of animals support natal habitat-based differentiation (Stamps 2001;Davis & Stamps 2004), and some observations support natal habitat-based dispersal, differentiation and fragmentation also in coyotes, a close relative of the grey wolf (Sacks et al 2005). Whereas random dispersal between different types of habitat will produce gene flow that limits local adaptation (Lenormand 2002), the combination of reduced gene flow and local adaptation facilitated by natal habitat-based dispersal might lead eventually to speciation (Sorenson et al 2003).…”
Section: Prey-mediated Differentiation Of Tundra/taiga and Boreal Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the considerable interest in the broader implications of NHPI, the vast majority of empirical studies of this phenomenon have been conducted in the laboratory and used insects as the experimental subjects (Davis & Stamps 2004;Davis 2006;Stamps & Davis 2006), although a few field studies have reported a population genetic structure consistent with NHPI (Sacks et al 2005;Tonnis et al 2005;Pilot et al 2006). Recently, Haughland & Larsen (2004) found that red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) born in either logged or intact coniferous forests were likely to recruit to new sites that were structurally similar to their natal site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%