2007
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersing brush mice prefer habitat like home

Abstract: During natal dispersal, young animals leave their natal area and search for a new area to live. In species in which individuals inhabit different types of habitat, experience with a natal habitat may increase the probability that a disperser will select the same type of habitat post-dispersal (natal habitat preference induction or NHPI ). Despite considerable interest in the ecological and the evolutionary implications of NHPI, we lack empirical evidence that it occurs in nature. Here we show that dispersing b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recognition of and preference for habitat features that resemble those of the natal area by dispersing individuals is termed habitat imprinting or natal habitat preference induction (NHPI) [12][13][14]. This mechanism for habitat selection is thought to have adaptive significance because a natal area that supports offspring to dispersal age likely typifies quality habitat [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognition of and preference for habitat features that resemble those of the natal area by dispersing individuals is termed habitat imprinting or natal habitat preference induction (NHPI) [12][13][14]. This mechanism for habitat selection is thought to have adaptive significance because a natal area that supports offspring to dispersal age likely typifies quality habitat [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strong spatial pattern has been interpreted as evidence that, following an initial urban colonization event, additional urban populations were established in a leapfrog manner (Luniak et al 1990). This could have occurred because individuals were either adapted to the novel habitat or imprinted on it (Mabry & Stamps 2008). This leapfrog model of urban colonization is particularly plausible in migratory or partially migratory species, such as the blackbird, in which occasional long-distance dispersal events of over 300 km have been recorded, even though natal and adult dispersal distances are typically much shorter than this, at approximately 3 km (Paradis et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growing evidence from a range of taxa demonstrates that dispersers often differ phenotypically from individuals that do not disperse (Benard and McCauley 2008;Clobert et al 2009) and that individuals with apparently similar capacities for dispersal may differ widely in how far they actually travel (Mabry and Stamps 2008). Behavioral, mor phological, or physiological differences between dispersers and nondispersers suggest that the interactions between dispersers and residents in the newly colonized patch may be quantitatively or qualitatively different than expected based on average values of these traits taken from both dispersers and nondispersers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dis tribution is often skewed toward many individuals dispers ing short distances, while a few individuals disperse over long distances. Moreover, as individuals search, they may be found long distances from the source population even though they may choose to settle and reproduce only a short distance away (Mabry and Stamps 2008). Here an average dispersal distance of 2 km ( a p 0.5) still leads to separation between the nearest and farthest pool location, while an average dispersal distance of 1 km ( a p 0.5) leads to prob able separation between all three.…”
Section: Spatial Context and Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%