1965
DOI: 10.3758/bf03343063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of monetary incentive in paired associate learning using an absolute method

Abstract: The design, apparatus, and stimulus materials of an earlier experiment (Harley, 1965) was duplicated with two exceptions: (1) An absolute method was used in the place of a differential method, and (2) each S was tested to a criterion of 3 consecutive correct trials. The results indicated that the magnitude of incentive had no effect upon learning which was consistant with many animal learning studies swnmarized by Pubols (1960). Learning was found to be more closely related to learning time (trials x exposure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

1968
1968
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that Ss spent the most time studying the material in the concept-judging task, less time in the handwriting task, and least time in the vowel cross-out task. There is fairly conclusive evidence that the amount learned is a positive function of total amount of time the material is studied (Bugelski, 1962;Harley, 1965). Therefore, these results do not unambiguously support the organizing response hypothesis.…”
contrasting
confidence: 44%
“…It is likely that Ss spent the most time studying the material in the concept-judging task, less time in the handwriting task, and least time in the vowel cross-out task. There is fairly conclusive evidence that the amount learned is a positive function of total amount of time the material is studied (Bugelski, 1962;Harley, 1965). Therefore, these results do not unambiguously support the organizing response hypothesis.…”
contrasting
confidence: 44%
“…Important or easily stored information is likely to be given preference. For example, Harley (1965) has shown in a mixed-list design that pairedassociate items given high monetary payoffs are selectively attended in preference to items given low payoffs. Information selection will also be governed by the degree to which the incoming material is already known.…”
Section: Storage Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their S group was heterogeneous; the response measure used was number correct. Harley (1965) and Keller, Cole, Burke, & Estes (1965) found no effect of monetary reinforcement on the learning of college student Ss. On the other hand, Kanfer & Matarazzo (1959) reported that student nurses reached criterion on a paired-associate task significantly more slowly when reinforced with nonredeemable poker chips than they did when chips could be redeemed for gifts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%