In an experiment employing the symbol-element recognition task (Mohs, Wescourt. & Atkinson, 1975). subjects first learned six lists consisting of four words (elements) each. Each list was associated with a unique consonant (symbol). Subsequently, on each of a series of test trials, subjects were presented with one, two, or four symbol-element pairs. A positive response was required if all test words were correctly paired with their associated consonants and a negative response if anyone test word was incorrectly paired with a consonant. Of primary concern was the way reaction time (RT) varied with number of pairs presented. the type of response required, and, on negative trials. the position of the mismatched pair in the test display. RT increased with the number of pairs presented on a trial and the increase was greater for positive than for negative trials. For negative pair trials. RT increased with the distance of the mismatched pair from the top of the test display. On negative trials in which the top pair in the test display was the mismatched pair, RT increased with the total number of pairs presented on the trial. A serial. probabilistic order of processing model is proposed to account for these results, and applications of the model to other paradigms are discussed.Reaction time (RT) paradigms have frequently been used to investigate the memory processes underlying word recognition. In studies of recognition memory for words stored in long-term memory. subjects generally learn a single list of words and later are asked whether each of a series of test words was or was not a member of the memorized list. In order to make inferences about the memory processes underlying performance in this type of task, investigators have manipulated variables such as list structure and composition and examined the effect of these variables on RT and error rate. At present there is still disagreement as to whether strength models (e.g., Kintsch, 1970; Murdock, 1968;Postman, Jenkins, & Postman, 1948;Wickelgren, 1975), memory search models (e.g., Anderson & Bower, 1974;Shiffrin & Atkinson, 1969;Tulving & Thomson, 1971), or a model employing a combination of strength and search processes (Atkinson & Iuola, 1973 can best account for performance in this task.Recently, a modified word recognition paradigm, called the symbol-element recognition paradigm, was employed by Mohs, Wescourt, and Atkinson (1975) to investigate the possible memory search processes involved in word recognition. In this paradigm subjects learn a number of distinct lists of words (called elements) and each list is associated with a unique consonant (called a symbol). On subsequent test trials subjects are given consonant-word (symbol-element) pairs and are asked whether the test word was on the list labeled by the test consonant. Subjects are to respond "Yes" if the word is a member of the list associated with the consonant and "No" if the word is a member of one of the other memorized lists. Since all test words are taken from one of the memorized lists, ...