2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00771.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of modified roofing on the milk yield and reproductive performance of heat‐stressed dairy cows under hot‐humid conditions

Abstract: The objective was to measure the effects of cooling techniques (shade cloth vs. normal roof) on performance and physiology of 16 Friesian crossbred cows (87.5% Holstein Friesian × 12.5% Brahman) located at Sakol Nakhon Livestock Research and Testing Station, Department of Livestock Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives (Sakol Nakhon, Thailand). They were divided randomly into two groups of eight. The two groups were used to evaluate the effects of modified roofing (normal roof fitted with woven… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inability to eliminate excess heat might probably have led to the rise in rectal temperature. The present finding are in agreement with [19] who concluded that cows provided with more protection (99% shade) from solar radiation as compared to 50% shade and no shade) had lower rectal temperature with higher level of ambient solar radiation [20] reported significantly higher (p<0.05) differences among the mean values of rectal temperature during summer under thatch roof (39.49±0.05) and under tin shed (39.54±0.05), which clearly indicated the inability of the kids housed in tin shed to make up with the higher environmental temperature [21] also reported significant difference among thatch roof shed, literoof and asbestos roof shed during hot summer [6], found significantly lower mean rectal temperature (38.56°C) in shade cloth than that of the cows housed under normal roofing (39.86°C). On the other hand [22] reported that in crossbred calves body temperature was not affected (p<0.05) by modification in the housing system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Inability to eliminate excess heat might probably have led to the rise in rectal temperature. The present finding are in agreement with [19] who concluded that cows provided with more protection (99% shade) from solar radiation as compared to 50% shade and no shade) had lower rectal temperature with higher level of ambient solar radiation [20] reported significantly higher (p<0.05) differences among the mean values of rectal temperature during summer under thatch roof (39.49±0.05) and under tin shed (39.54±0.05), which clearly indicated the inability of the kids housed in tin shed to make up with the higher environmental temperature [21] also reported significant difference among thatch roof shed, literoof and asbestos roof shed during hot summer [6], found significantly lower mean rectal temperature (38.56°C) in shade cloth than that of the cows housed under normal roofing (39.86°C). On the other hand [22] reported that in crossbred calves body temperature was not affected (p<0.05) by modification in the housing system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present finding is also in agreement with the observation of [25] who reported higher RR during afternoon than morning hr. in crossbred calves during summer [22] observed higher (p<0.05) respiration counts in loose house as compared to those animals kept in thatch house [6], found significantly lower respiration rate (61.97 breaths/min) in shade cloth than that of the cows housed under normal roofing (85.16 breaths/min) [26] reported increased respiration rate with increase in surrounding heat and observed that this increase was more marked in the 2.4 m 2 shade/ cow and no shade treatments than in the 9.6 m 2 shade/ cow treatments. These results indicated that cattle use shade to prevent an increase in internal body temperature, but this heat mitigation strategy is only effective if a sufficient amount of shade is provided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is less tolerant to extremes of heat and cold than various breeds of cattle (Marai and Habeeb, 2010). There are reports indicating that milk yield, growth and fertility of both cattle (De Rensis and Scaramuzzi, 2003;Khongdee et al, 2010) and swamp buffalo (Marai and Habeeb, 2010) are all reduced during periods of high ambient temperature. Each of these variables shows a direct relationship with rectal temperature (Goswani and Nair, 1964), for example, there were increases in rectal temperature from 38.5 to 39.7 1C when swamp buffalo and cows (340-375 kg, 4-7 years old) were subjected to acute heat exposure (41 1C; without wallow) for 5 h (Chaiyabutr et al, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A study conducted in Thailand during the summer reported a higher milk yield and a lower rectal temperature in crossbreed cows (87.5% Holstein Friesian × 12.5% Brahman) under an open shed fitted with corrugated iron roof and covered with shade cloth with 70% shade factor and that was stretched at 100 cm above the entire roof, compared to cows under a normal roof (Khongdee et al . ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%