2021
DOI: 10.3390/jrfm14080375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Misalignment of CEO Personality and Corporate Governance Structures on Firm Performance

Abstract: We utilize the IBM Watson Personality Insights service to analyze CEOs’ verbal communication during conference calls to infer CEOs’ Big Five personality traits, which we employ to estimate their risk tolerance levels. We then explore whether the misalignment of CEO risk tolerance and governance structures is associated with company performance. Using a two-stage contingency approach, we test two hypotheses: (1) CEO risk tolerance and corporate governance structures are associated; and (2) misalignment of these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bandiera et al 2020;Saidu 2019;Wei et al 2018;Kaur and Singh 2018a; Weng and Chen 2017;Diks 2016;Amran et al 2014;Peni 2014) documents very similar results, supporting upper echelons theory. Furthermore, empirical studies provide evidence that knowledge about CEO's inherent personality traits, for instance, overconfidence (see Hirshleifer et al 2012;Doukas and Petmezas 2007;Malmendier and Tate 2005), narcissism (see Brouwer 2018;Wang 2016), risk-tolerance (see Gordon et al 2021), military background (see Lin et al 2018;Benmelech and Frydman 2015), and political ideology (see Wei et al 2018;Kashmiri and Mahajan 2017;Unsal et al 2016), among others, are important and relevant for firms to operate efficiently.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bandiera et al 2020;Saidu 2019;Wei et al 2018;Kaur and Singh 2018a; Weng and Chen 2017;Diks 2016;Amran et al 2014;Peni 2014) documents very similar results, supporting upper echelons theory. Furthermore, empirical studies provide evidence that knowledge about CEO's inherent personality traits, for instance, overconfidence (see Hirshleifer et al 2012;Doukas and Petmezas 2007;Malmendier and Tate 2005), narcissism (see Brouwer 2018;Wang 2016), risk-tolerance (see Gordon et al 2021), military background (see Lin et al 2018;Benmelech and Frydman 2015), and political ideology (see Wei et al 2018;Kashmiri and Mahajan 2017;Unsal et al 2016), among others, are important and relevant for firms to operate efficiently.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research also has a limitation where personality traits and style of thinking of risk management committee members are not considered. Gordon et al . (2021) also suggest that effective governance mechanism is determined by personality, knowledge, manner and style of thinking (rational or intuitive).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research also has a limitation where personality traits and style of thinking of risk management committee members are not considered. Gordon et al (2021) also suggest that effective governance mechanism is determined by personality, knowledge, manner and style of thinking (rational or intuitive). Future research is expected to examine the effective risk management committee by characteristics of personality, knowledge, manner and style of thinking (rational or intuitive) by using interviews or questionaries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this configuration, the managers, who effectively control the company, have both the discretion and the incentives to pursue their personal interests at the expense of the shareholders. To alleviate this agency problem, effective corporate governance structures are needed to help align the interests of managers with those of shareholders (Fama and Jensen, 1983; Bebchuk and Weisbach, 2010; Gordon et al , 2021; Faysal et al , 2021; Salehi et al , 2021). In fact, shareholders may demand more control mechanisms to oversee managers to reduce agency costs such as external audits (Anderson et al , 1993), corporate governance and accountability disclosure (Jo and Harjoto, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%