2015 3rd RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICROM) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icrom.2015.7367856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of microchannel width on mixing efficiency of microfluidic electroosmotic mixer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As is shown in No.1 diagram, red line represents Zeta potential value is positive, Blue line represents Zeta potential value is negative. Different Zeta potential distribution can be realized by different settings of coating material in the wall [10].…”
Section: Channel Structure and Wall Zeta Potential Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is shown in No.1 diagram, red line represents Zeta potential value is positive, Blue line represents Zeta potential value is negative. Different Zeta potential distribution can be realized by different settings of coating material in the wall [10].…”
Section: Channel Structure and Wall Zeta Potential Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the LIGA process, precision electroforming of the metal mold is a key step that influences the quality of the molded polymer products [9,10]. The functions of microfluidic chips are largely determined by the size of the microfeatures [11][12][13]. For micro features with large width or high aspect ratio, the electroformed microcolumns are easily confronted with the problem of low filling ratio or void defect [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, deploying novel synthesis techniques such as bipolar exfoliation can reduce the cost of fabrication [15][16][17][18]. Moreover, label-free electrochemical detection can reduce the cost of operation and blood sample consumption by requiring relatively simple sample preparation [19][20][21][22]; although, the performance of the proposed label-free electrochemical aptasensors (e.g., dynamic range, selectivity, and sensitivity) lags the performance of other sensing techniques such as optical and labeled aptasensors, which indicates the necessity of additional improvements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%