1984
DOI: 10.5006/1.3577915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Methods of Cutting and Grinding on Sensitization in Surface Layers on AISI 304 Stainless Steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DL-EPR test optimum conditions for the austenitic stainless steel correspond to the following: electrolyte composed of 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 and 0.01 M NH 4 SCN, electrolyte temperature close to 25°C, and a potential scanning rate of 1 mV/s. To emphasize the importance of the DL-EPR operating conditions regarding the test response, other conditions reported by previous investigators [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]11,13,14,17] were also tested to evaluate the DOS of annealed and aged AISI 316L SS. The corresponding DOS values, reported in Table VI, reveal clear advantages of the optimum operating conditions established in this study.…”
Section: Synthesis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The DL-EPR test optimum conditions for the austenitic stainless steel correspond to the following: electrolyte composed of 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 and 0.01 M NH 4 SCN, electrolyte temperature close to 25°C, and a potential scanning rate of 1 mV/s. To emphasize the importance of the DL-EPR operating conditions regarding the test response, other conditions reported by previous investigators [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]11,13,14,17] were also tested to evaluate the DOS of annealed and aged AISI 316L SS. The corresponding DOS values, reported in Table VI, reveal clear advantages of the optimum operating conditions established in this study.…”
Section: Synthesis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the activator is HCl in the case of the EPR modified method. [2,19] It is also indicated that the potential scanning rate ranges between 0.5 and 5 mV/s [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]18] and that the selected electrolyte temperature is 25°C [2,11] or 30°C. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]12,13,16,18] In spite of numerous studies involving the EPR technique, the optimum operating conditions remain unidentified for many commercial alloys likely to be sensitized to IGC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] In spite of several studies performed on the prior-deformation effect on sensitization and IGC, a universally accepted conclusion is yet to be made. The reasons of such conflicting results could be due to the consideration of limited strains (either tensile or compressive), [4,6,8,9] temperatures, [8,10,11] or times [7,10,12] as variables in such studies. In this study, we use a wide range of the aforementioned variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Though it is well observed that the increase in prior deformation accelerates the sensitization process [7,20,[22][23][24][25][26], there are also reports [12,27] in support of the non monotonous behaviour between cold work and sensitization. In fact, besides the increase in the rate of sensitization, higher deformation also enhances the diffusion of chromium which in turn increases the desensitization process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%