1978
DOI: 10.3758/bf03336765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of luminance on metacontrast with internally contoured targets

Abstract: Recent studies have provided evidence which contradicts the previous finding that target detectability decreases with increases in the number of internal contours in the target. The present study attempted to reconcile these discrepant findings by examining the effect of luminance level on detectability of internally contoured targets under mask and no-mask conditions. The results showed that the different luminance levels used in these studies may have indeed contributed to the discrepant results.Visual perce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of this manipulation, display durations were idiosyncratic between participants. However, nonmonotonic metacontrast has been found over a range of target and mask durations-for example, 100 msec (Merikle, 1977), 60 msec (Bernstein, Proctor, Belcher, & Schurman, 1974), and 50 msec (Proctor, Nunn, & Pallos, 1983)-whereas Arand and Dember (1978) varied target duration, keeping the mask duration constant at 105 msec. Therefore, it was not anticipated that the differences in target and mask durations would influence the nature of the metacontrast function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of this manipulation, display durations were idiosyncratic between participants. However, nonmonotonic metacontrast has been found over a range of target and mask durations-for example, 100 msec (Merikle, 1977), 60 msec (Bernstein, Proctor, Belcher, & Schurman, 1974), and 50 msec (Proctor, Nunn, & Pallos, 1983)-whereas Arand and Dember (1978) varied target duration, keeping the mask duration constant at 105 msec. Therefore, it was not anticipated that the differences in target and mask durations would influence the nature of the metacontrast function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%