1994
DOI: 10.1249/00005768-199404000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of lower body positive pressure on the exercise capacity of individuals with spinal cord injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have used leg positive pressure to augment VO 2peak in SCI. Pitetti et al 8 found that a pulsating anti-gravity suit pressure of 50-75 mm Hg in combination with ACE and/or wheelchair propulsion in eight tetraplegic individuals resulted in a higher mean VO 2peak and arm work rate compared with arm exercise alone, in line with the findings for the SCI-high group in our study. Whereas Houtman et al 7 using a pulsating anti-gravity suit pressure in conjunction with ACE, assessing individuals with level of injury between L 1 and L 5 , found no significant difference in VO 2peak compared with ACE alone, similar to the findings for the SCI-low group in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies have used leg positive pressure to augment VO 2peak in SCI. Pitetti et al 8 found that a pulsating anti-gravity suit pressure of 50-75 mm Hg in combination with ACE and/or wheelchair propulsion in eight tetraplegic individuals resulted in a higher mean VO 2peak and arm work rate compared with arm exercise alone, in line with the findings for the SCI-high group in our study. Whereas Houtman et al 7 using a pulsating anti-gravity suit pressure in conjunction with ACE, assessing individuals with level of injury between L 1 and L 5 , found no significant difference in VO 2peak compared with ACE alone, similar to the findings for the SCI-low group in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, comparisons between studies should be made with caution because of methodological diversity and population heterogeneity, that is, lack of consistent determination criteria for VO 2peak and different levels of SCI. The criteria for VO 2peak in our study differ from those by Pitetti et al 8 and Houtman et al 7 Furthermore, creating group homogeneity according to level and completeness of SCI, age and gender is challenging, although important when assessing aerobic performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations