2016
DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Laser Fiber Cleave Technique and Lithotripsy Time on Power Output

Abstract: These findings confirm that initial laser fiber power output is significantly influenced by cleave technique, and the ceramic scissor is the optimal tool for cleaving between procedures. However, because of rapid fiber tip degradation and power loss, this study argues against routine cleaving to improve procedural efficiency in lengthy ureteroscopy cases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Haddad et al evaluated the effects of different laser cleaving techniques on lithotripsy and found no significant clinical difference between techniques after 1 minute of lithotripsy. In a similar study, Peplinski et al noted variable initial power output with different cleave techniques; however, this difference disappeared after 3 minutes of use. In that study, larger fibers were noted to have more durable power output with time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Haddad et al evaluated the effects of different laser cleaving techniques on lithotripsy and found no significant clinical difference between techniques after 1 minute of lithotripsy. In a similar study, Peplinski et al noted variable initial power output with different cleave techniques; however, this difference disappeared after 3 minutes of use. In that study, larger fibers were noted to have more durable power output with time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The effectiveness of several fiber‐cleaving devices has been evaluated in the urology literature relative to holmium:yttrium aluminum garnet lasers. Vassantachart et al compared different cleaving tools, and found the pen cleaving tool and scalpel resulted in better power output as compared to metallic scissors and a cleaving wheel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another advantage of keeping the fibers coated is that most of these fibers are able to pass through all angles of deflections in most scopes, while stripped fibers cannot without being harmful to the scopes’ working channel [ 66 ]. However, there is also evidence that initial advantages of certain cleaving methods over another level themselves out and the fibers become quite similar in performance in the first minutes of lithotripsy, because of equal, short-term fiber degradation [ 65 , 67 , 68 •]. However, even over this topic, there is controversy among researchers, with some advocating against routine cleaving [ 67 ], others endorsing fiber tip preparation and renewal after 15 min or 10,000 J of laser emission, which is also important for reusable fibers [ 63 ••, 68 •, 69 ], while still others claim that stripped fibers achieve greater stone ablation [ 65 ].…”
Section: Bibliographic Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five kinds of fiber tips were compared: a new intact fiber, cleaved with ceramic scissors, cleaved with metallic scissors, first cleaved then stripped and first stripped then cleaved. The fibers were surgical scissors, scalpel, ceramic scissors and/or strippers have been used [5,6]. The aim of this study was to compare different methods of cleavage in order to improve the efficiency of the laser fibers in endourology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%