1953
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0321090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Large Versus Small End Up on Assigned Egg Grade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1956
1956
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results confirm those of Baker (1953) and substantiate the opinion of Dawson and Hall (1954) that the eggs placed small end up are judged as being of a worse quality grade because of the more visible yolk by candling. These results confirm those of Baker (1953) and substantiate the opinion of Dawson and Hall (1954) that the eggs placed small end up are judged as being of a worse quality grade because of the more visible yolk by candling.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results confirm those of Baker (1953) and substantiate the opinion of Dawson and Hall (1954) that the eggs placed small end up are judged as being of a worse quality grade because of the more visible yolk by candling. These results confirm those of Baker (1953) and substantiate the opinion of Dawson and Hall (1954) that the eggs placed small end up are judged as being of a worse quality grade because of the more visible yolk by candling.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The position of the egg also influences the visibility of the yolk in candling and therefore, also the candling grade quality, as has been already shown by Baker (1953). The yolk in the sac of the thick egg white is surrounded by the middle thin egg white which allows little movement of the yolk inside the egg.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation