2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00222.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of information sources on technology adoption and modification decisions

Abstract: This article focuses on adoption and modification decisions on improved maize storage technologies in southern Benin. Modification implies changing a technology to adapt to farmers' circumstances. A sample selection framework is used to account for selectivity bias as some farmers were not aware of the new technologies. Using this framework, the study investigates the effect of alternative information sources on adoption and modification decisions. Farmers are either informed by extension agents or by other fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
80
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
80
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Farmers often adapt technologies for their own particular situations, rather than accepting the technology for its 'intended' use (Adegbola and Gardebroek, 2007). There is no reason to expect that perennial grain adoption will be different from other transformative technologies, based on the evidence from these interviews.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farmers often adapt technologies for their own particular situations, rather than accepting the technology for its 'intended' use (Adegbola and Gardebroek, 2007). There is no reason to expect that perennial grain adoption will be different from other transformative technologies, based on the evidence from these interviews.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…their aptitude to be flexible in response to the market and environment changes, is also a determinant (Clark and Fujimoto, 1991;Wang and Ahmed, 2007;Woiceshyn and Daellenbach, 2005). The awareness level, which is determined by contact frequency with extension agents and support received or membership of an association, has also been found to significantly affect farmers' willingness to change (Adegbola and Gardebroek, 2007). The institutional environment and market context in which farmers are embedded, also determine their decisions about whether or not to adopt a new technology (Adegbola and Gardebroek, 2007;Thangata and 4.…”
Section: Willingness To Pay For Market Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the literature, several factors (X ij ) are hypothesised as affecting farmers' willingness to adopt innovations (Adegbola and Gardebroek, 2007;Adesina and Zinnah, 1993;Adesina et al, 2000;Binam et al, 2004;Feder et al, 1985;Herath and Takeya, 2003;Sall et al, 2000). These factors include socio-economic characteristics, such as age, farming experience and income or profit (Adegbola and Gardebroek, 2007;Adesina and Zinnah, 1993;Arinloye et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Willingness To Pay For Market Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different factors found in the literature, the most frequently considered are: education and behavioural characteristics of the farmer (Nicholson et al, 1999;Baerenklau, 2005); information sources and presence of programmes and organizations for transference (Pender, 2004;Adegbola and Gardebroek, 2007); and access to financial and input/output markets (Nicholson et al, 1999;Baltenweck et al, 2003), which is closely related to farm location (Staal et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%