1966
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0450805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of High Dietary Calcium on the Performance of Laying Hens Fed Rations of Varying Energy Levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
3

Year Published

1968
1968
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the findings of Kienholz and McPherron (1964), Mehring (1965), and Hurwitz and Bornstein (1966) the dietary calcium level of 4.5% did not depress feed consumption nor egg weight as compared to the 3.0% calcium diet. In three out of four experiments the hens fed the 1.5% calcium diet consumed less feed than the hens fed the 4.5% calcium diet.…”
Section: Various Calcium Levels For the Laying Hencontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Contrary to the findings of Kienholz and McPherron (1964), Mehring (1965), and Hurwitz and Bornstein (1966) the dietary calcium level of 4.5% did not depress feed consumption nor egg weight as compared to the 3.0% calcium diet. In three out of four experiments the hens fed the 1.5% calcium diet consumed less feed than the hens fed the 4.5% calcium diet.…”
Section: Various Calcium Levels For the Laying Hencontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…These findings agreed with the report of Harms et al (1961) that levels of calcium in excess of five percent do not significantly influence feed intake of laying hens or performance under the conditions in which their tests were performed. They disagree with the report of Hurwitz and Bornstein (1966) and Hurwitz et al (1969). The hens used by Hurwitz and co-workers consumed considerably more feed than those used by the birds in this experiment and those used by Harms et al (1961).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Harms and Waldroup (1971), however, reported that increasing the calcium levels from 2.5 to 3.75% or from 2.5 to 5.0% of the diet had no effect on egg production between 63 and 79 weeks of age. Hurwitz and Bornstein (1966), Roland et al (1974), andScott et al (1971) found that feed intake was higher if the laying diet contained 2 to 2.5% rather than 3% calcium, but their results do not agree with those in Table 5.…”
Section: *••contrasting
confidence: 51%