2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-3057(03)00130-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of hard and soft segment composition and molecular architecture on the morphology and mechanical properties of polystyrene–polyisobutylene thermoplastic elastomeric block copolymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
62
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
10
62
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the tensile properties of the SIBS nanofibre during the first stretch resemble those of thermoplastic elastomers that have a higher volume fraction of glassy polymer resulting in a continuous phase of glassy polymer rather than the equilibrium isolated spherical domains of the SIBS used here. 83,84 It is possible that the electrospinning process produces an unusual, non-equilibrium microstructure of continuous PS phase with dispersed rubbery domains. During tensile extension, these glassy PS regions yield and break-up to form a discontinuous phase which then resembles the typical equilibrium structure of SIBS.…”
Section: Resilience Of Thermoplastic Elastomer Nanofibresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the tensile properties of the SIBS nanofibre during the first stretch resemble those of thermoplastic elastomers that have a higher volume fraction of glassy polymer resulting in a continuous phase of glassy polymer rather than the equilibrium isolated spherical domains of the SIBS used here. 83,84 It is possible that the electrospinning process produces an unusual, non-equilibrium microstructure of continuous PS phase with dispersed rubbery domains. During tensile extension, these glassy PS regions yield and break-up to form a discontinuous phase which then resembles the typical equilibrium structure of SIBS.…”
Section: Resilience Of Thermoplastic Elastomer Nanofibresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We continued investigating structure-property relationships in PIB-PS block copolymers, and developed new carbocationic initiators, and new PIB-based structures. [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] We consider linear triblock PS-PIB-PS (Fig. 1) the first generation of this new class of TPEs, with multiarm-star PIB-PS being the second generation and arborescent PIB-PS the third generation.…”
Section: Pib-based Biomaterials Research In the Macromolecular Engineementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tensile strength values are lower than the 17-24 MPa with 600 -800% elongation published for linear PS-PIB-PS triblocks 52,58 but comparable to the tensile strength of commercially produced, test-marketed PS-PIB-PS ( ϭ 10 MPa, ⑀ ϭ 600%). 59 Importantly, all of these values exceed the strength of soft tissues. 1 AFM studies of the arborescent blocks revealed irregular phase morphologies.…”
Section: Aborescent Pib-ps Block Copolymers By Inimer-type Living Polmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Some of the common thermoplastic elastomers are segmented polyurethane, poly(styrene-b-butylene-b-styrene), poly-(styrene-b-isoprene-b-styrene), and poly(styrene-bisoprene). [1][2][3][4][5] For examples, poly(styrene-b-isopreneb-styrene) and poly(styrene-b-isoprene) are generally used for pressure sensitive applications, where durability and elasticity are important. 4,5 In recent years, electrostatic spinning or electrospinning has been viewed as a simple and versatile method for fabricating ultrafine fibers with diameters in the nanometer to sub-micrometer range.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] For examples, poly(styrene-b-isopreneb-styrene) and poly(styrene-b-isoprene) are generally used for pressure sensitive applications, where durability and elasticity are important. 4,5 In recent years, electrostatic spinning or electrospinning has been viewed as a simple and versatile method for fabricating ultrafine fibers with diameters in the nanometer to sub-micrometer range. [6][7][8] The heart of the technique is the use of a high electrical potential applying to a spinning liquid across a charged nozzle and a grounded screen collector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%