2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of Gibbs ringing artifacts on measures derived from diffusion MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
1
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the convenience of a brute force technique, e.g. smoothing or total variation minimization (Block et al, 2008; Veraart et al, 2015; Perrone et al, 2015), that might deal with different types of unwanted fluctuations simultaneously, we here advocate the use of targeted artifact correction techniques for improved accuracy and specificity. Other examples of targeted image processing tools are the Gibbs correction framework of Kellner et al (2015) or FSL’s TOPUP and EDDY for EPI and eddy current distortion corrections, respectively (Smith et al, 2004; Sotiropoulos et al, 2013; Glasser et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the convenience of a brute force technique, e.g. smoothing or total variation minimization (Block et al, 2008; Veraart et al, 2015; Perrone et al, 2015), that might deal with different types of unwanted fluctuations simultaneously, we here advocate the use of targeted artifact correction techniques for improved accuracy and specificity. Other examples of targeted image processing tools are the Gibbs correction framework of Kellner et al (2015) or FSL’s TOPUP and EDDY for EPI and eddy current distortion corrections, respectively (Smith et al, 2004; Sotiropoulos et al, 2013; Glasser et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations are the dependency on a regularization term, introduction of reconstruction artifacts, and the fact that thermal noise is not the sole source of local variations. Indeed, fine anatomical details might be removed as well by this non-selective technique (Block et al, 2008; Knoll et al, 2011; Veraart et al, 2015; Perrone et al, 2015). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was verified during the ROI delineation procedure. Recent studies have shown the presence of Gibbs ringing in d-MRI data to severely impact parameter estimation and have demonstrated a number of strategies to suppress the artifact prior to analysis (Kellner et al, 2015; Perrone et al, 2015; Veraart et al, 2015). In the present study, Gaussian low pass filtering was employed for smoothing the data to reduce the Gibbs ringing artefacts, similar to previously published methods (Tabesh et al, 2011; Veraart et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DSI, on the other hand, uses a large number of diffusion encoding vectors to characterize diffusion dynamics, which could have lower angular variability from the dODF reconstruction but an increased likelihood for subject motion. DKI is also known to be sensitive to reconstruction artifacts resulting from Gibbs ringing (34,35) and noise bias (36), although these are also expected to affect DSI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, DKI substantially decreases the error of dODF orientation estimates relative to DTI. Moreover, DKI enables the detection of crossing fibers, which results in pronounced improvements relative to DTI for tractography throughout regions with complex fiber bundle geometries (15,16,32,35). Indeed, our results indicate that the tractography obtained with DKI is qualitatively quite comparable to that for DSI, in spite of DKI sampling a much smaller portion of q-space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%