2016
DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-9847-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of future ambient air pollution on human premature mortality to 2100 using output from the ACCMIP model ensemble

Abstract: Ambient air pollution from ground-level ozone and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is associated with premature mortality. Future concentrations of these air pollutants will be driven by natural and anthropogenic emissions and by climate change. Using anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions projected in the four Representative Concentration Pathway scenarios (RCPs), the ACCMIP ensemble of chemistry-climate models simulated future concentrations of ozone and PM2.5 at selected decades between 2000 and 2100. W… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
119
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
119
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While some models reported hourly O 3 metrics, others only reported daily or monthly O 3 . We include these models by first calculating the ratio of the 6-month average of daily 1 h maximum O 3 to the annual average of O 3 in individual grid cells, for models reporting hourly O 3 , and then applying that ratio to the annual average of ozone for those models that only report daily or monthly O 3 , following Silva et al (2013Silva et al ( , 2016b. For PM 2.5 , we calculate the annual average PM 2.5 concentration in each cell using the monthly total PM 2.5 concentrations reported by each model ("mmrpm2p5").…”
Section: Modeled O 3 and Pm 25 Surface Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some models reported hourly O 3 metrics, others only reported daily or monthly O 3 . We include these models by first calculating the ratio of the 6-month average of daily 1 h maximum O 3 to the annual average of O 3 in individual grid cells, for models reporting hourly O 3 , and then applying that ratio to the annual average of ozone for those models that only report daily or monthly O 3 , following Silva et al (2013Silva et al ( , 2016b. For PM 2.5 , we calculate the annual average PM 2.5 concentration in each cell using the monthly total PM 2.5 concentrations reported by each model ("mmrpm2p5").…”
Section: Modeled O 3 and Pm 25 Surface Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We include these models by first calculating the ratio of the 6-month average of 216 daily 1-h maximum O3 to the annual average of O3 in individual grid cells, for models 217 reporting hourly O3, and then applying that ratio to the annual average of ozone for 218 those models that only report daily or monthly O3, following Silva et al (2013;2016b for 187 countries from the GBD 2010 mortality dataset (IHME, 2013). The population 276 and baseline mortality per age group were regridded to the 0.5 ο ×0.5 ο grid (Table S2 277 and Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous health impact assessments have used national baseline mortality rates (Cohen et al, 2017;Silva et al, 2016aSilva et al, , 2016b, but baseline mortality rates can vary strongly within individual counties (supporting Figure S5; Dwyer-Lindgren et al, 2016). We performed sensitivity analyses by applying the national average baseline mortality rates for each disease to every county in the mortality burden calculations.…”
Section: Mortality Burdens Trends and Contributing Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For PM2.5, is calculated using the integrated exposure-response (IER) model (Burnett et al, 2014), which has been extensively used by recent studies, including Liu et al (2017), Silva et al (2016a, b), Wang et al (2017), and World Health 10 Organization (2016). The is calculated as a function of PM2.5 concentration following Eq.…”
Section: Mortality Burden Attributable To Ambient Air Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%