1988
DOI: 10.1016/0377-8401(88)90091-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of five different supplements on the degradation of straw in sheep given untreated barley straw

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…content is comparatively lower (Silva & Orskov 1988). The poor intake and digestibility values obtained for the unsupplemented animals is a result of the fact that Ration D had crude protein levels that are below the recommended minimum values for maintenance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…content is comparatively lower (Silva & Orskov 1988). The poor intake and digestibility values obtained for the unsupplemented animals is a result of the fact that Ration D had crude protein levels that are below the recommended minimum values for maintenance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Ammonia production with mixtures is also greater during this lag phase (Butterworth and Mosi, 1986;Bowman and Asplund, 1988b;Brown and Pitman, 1991). The presence of a source of easily fermentable cellulose and hemicellulose in the diet increases the number of fibrolytic microorganisms, stimulating digestibility of other source of less degradable fibres (Silva and Orskov, 1988). That is for this reason that alkaline treatments which hydrolyse and solubilise fibres can strongly modify poor forage digestibility (Atwell et al, 1991).…”
Section: Associative Effects Between Low-quality Forages and Complemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This does not allow for effective degradation, hence lowering the digestibility of feed. Increasing the level of crop residue inclusion in the diet also increases the amount of lignin, which depresses the digestibility of the ration [9], because the rate of microbial colonisation of a feed with high fibre content is comparatively lower [10]. The poor intake and digestibility values obtained for the unsupplemented animals is due to the fact that ration D was of low quality as a result of its high NDF and lignin contents.…”
Section: Ration Intake and Digestibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%