2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10499-012-9563-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of fish size and stocking density on the weaning success of pond-cultured pikeperch Sander lucioperca L. juveniles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to species-dependent morphological differences, the variability of dimensions during ontogeny and behaviour typical of a given species, diverse mathematical models are applied. The most commonly used models include those based on direct measurements of total length (TL) of cannibals and their prey or models based on such parameters as mouth width (MW), mouth gape (MG), body depth (BD) of a prey, head depth (HD) of a prey and head width (HW) of a prey (Folkvord and Otterå 1993;Baras and Dalmeida 2001;Hseu 2002;Kailasam et al 2002;Kestemont et al 2003;Hseu et al 2003b;Fessehaye et al 2005;Wallat et al 2005;Hseu et al 2007;Policar et al 2013;Baras et al 2014;Hseu and Huang 2014;Ribeiro and Qin 2015).…”
Section: Size-sortingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to species-dependent morphological differences, the variability of dimensions during ontogeny and behaviour typical of a given species, diverse mathematical models are applied. The most commonly used models include those based on direct measurements of total length (TL) of cannibals and their prey or models based on such parameters as mouth width (MW), mouth gape (MG), body depth (BD) of a prey, head depth (HD) of a prey and head width (HW) of a prey (Folkvord and Otterå 1993;Baras and Dalmeida 2001;Hseu 2002;Kailasam et al 2002;Kestemont et al 2003;Hseu et al 2003b;Fessehaye et al 2005;Wallat et al 2005;Hseu et al 2007;Policar et al 2013;Baras et al 2014;Hseu and Huang 2014;Ribeiro and Qin 2015).…”
Section: Size-sortingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of the pond culture system are: natural food, rapid fi sh growth, high-quality of produced juveniles, low production cost, elimination of abnormal fi sh, environmentally friendly and sustainable fi sh production without any fi sh deformity. RAS provides controlled and stable production conditions throughout year resulting in rapid growth rate and thus shorter production cycle of marketable fi sh (Stejskal et al 2010 ;Policar et al 2013 ). Currently, the greatest limitation of this system for perch rearing is only one batch production per year, when initial pond culture of this system is possible to carry out during later spring or summer period.…”
Section: Semi-intensive Perch Farming Using the Combination Of Pond Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, S. lucioperca is being domesticated and is commercially fished. Moreover, it is predicted that the production of marketable S. lucioperca with intensive culture will increase due to its excellent flesh quality, high growth rate, good market value (Blecha et al, 2016), suitability for intensive culturing (Wang et al, 2009;Szczepkowski et al, 2011) and, especially, to the decrease in the numbers of fish in wild populations and in catches, which have reduced by over 50% during the past 30-40 years (Policar et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%