2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of fibre orientation, measurement interval and muscle on lamb meat drip loss values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the direction of the muscle fibers in the samples used for the EZ method is vertical, whereas for the BM it is horizontal and could be the reason for higher drip loss values found in BM. Concerning this, Holman et al (2020), reported no differences in EZ drip loss of the semimembranosus muscle using horizontal and vertical sample fiber orientations. They explained that smaller drip loss sample size had lesser physical resistance for immobilization of this water fraction as it transverses the meat structural matrix and may have overcome any fiber orientation to drip loss variation of the samples.…”
Section: Relationship Between Drip Loss Values Measured By Ez Methods mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the direction of the muscle fibers in the samples used for the EZ method is vertical, whereas for the BM it is horizontal and could be the reason for higher drip loss values found in BM. Concerning this, Holman et al (2020), reported no differences in EZ drip loss of the semimembranosus muscle using horizontal and vertical sample fiber orientations. They explained that smaller drip loss sample size had lesser physical resistance for immobilization of this water fraction as it transverses the meat structural matrix and may have overcome any fiber orientation to drip loss variation of the samples.…”
Section: Relationship Between Drip Loss Values Measured By Ez Methods mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Meat color parameters (L * -lightness, a * -redness, and b * -yellowness) were successively measured on the cross section of the LL muscle after a 1 h blooming period using a chroma meter (Konica Minolta Chroma Meter CR 400, Osaka, Japan). Drip loss was measured according to the EZ method (Rasmussen and Andersson, 1996) and bag method -BM (Honikel, 1998). For determination of drip loss according to BM, the 60 g of sample was removed from the cranial edge of the LL muscle.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drip loss is a measure of water-weight loss because of gravimetric forces. This metric is able to provide insight into WHC, and consequentially it is valuable to evaluate meat quality [ 38 ]. The present results showed that medium supplementary RPAA decreased the 24 h drip loss in LD as compared to the control group, which indicated that the supplementation of RPL and RPM would improve WHC of yak meat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drip loss has the potential to occur at 24 h postmortem [ 44 ]. In general, drip loss is a process that involves the transfer of water from myofibrils in muscle tissue to extracellular tissue [ 45 ]. The level of drip loss is related to the functions of actin and myosin in the muscle after slaughter [ 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%