1981
DOI: 10.1016/0010-938x(81)90017-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of FeO grain size and cavities on the oxidation of Fe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. Parabolic rate constants determined in this work are in good agreement with data available in the literature [5,11,18,19,23,[31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Materials and Experimental Proceduressupporting
confidence: 86%
“…1. Parabolic rate constants determined in this work are in good agreement with data available in the literature [5,11,18,19,23,[31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Materials and Experimental Proceduressupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Compared the parabolic rate constants of previous studies [41,[45][46][47][48] with the present work, the solid line signified the current study lies along the upper limit of the spread of k p values for the dot line. The activation energy of 179.2 kJ/mol corresponds closely to that of iron reported 194.9 kJ/mol (46.6 kcal/mol) between 640 and 805 C [45]. Further, the lower value of activation energy exactly approximates to that 174.5 kJ/mol for Fe in the Fe grain boundaries diffusion between 530 and 650 C [49].…”
Section: Initiation Of Oxidation Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…For instance, it was reported that FeO can readily form on the surface at 604°C in air, which is close to the used oxidation temperature but is in contrast to the phases found by XRD and EDX (Figure and Table ). The second possibility would be that a two‐layered structure consisting of hematite and magnetite in the ratio of 1:10 or 1:20 could have been formed because the used oxidation temperature is only 30°C above the wustite temperature. This would not be in accordance with the fact that ca.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%