2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of feeding expeller-pressed canola meal on growth performance and diet nutrient digestibility in weaned pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
19
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
12
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study,replacing 11% SBM with 13% DL-RSM had no negative effect on the ADG, ADFI and FCR of finishing pigs during the entire experimental period (Table 3), and the digestibility of CP, EE, Ash, CF and TP was also not significantly affected (P>0.05) ( Table 4). These findings are in agreement with previous reports (Lee et al, 1983;Thacker and Qiao, 2002;Landero et al, 2012). Extrusion and adding exogenous enzymes could be effective ways to improve the nutritional quality and reduce the activity of antinutritional factors in feedstuffs (Bedford and Clasen, 1992;Choct, 1999;Friesen et al, 1993).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In the current study,replacing 11% SBM with 13% DL-RSM had no negative effect on the ADG, ADFI and FCR of finishing pigs during the entire experimental period (Table 3), and the digestibility of CP, EE, Ash, CF and TP was also not significantly affected (P>0.05) ( Table 4). These findings are in agreement with previous reports (Lee et al, 1983;Thacker and Qiao, 2002;Landero et al, 2012). Extrusion and adding exogenous enzymes could be effective ways to improve the nutritional quality and reduce the activity of antinutritional factors in feedstuffs (Bedford and Clasen, 1992;Choct, 1999;Friesen et al, 1993).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Our analyzed values for total Ca in BNB and BJY were in close agreement with Landero et al (2012) for EPCM (6.5 g kg −1 ). However, the values were higher than a study reported by Seneviratne et al(2010) where the value was only 5.6 g kg −1 for EPCM.…”
Section: Landero Et Al (2012) Using Expeller Pressed CM (Epcm)supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Interestingly, there was no effect on ADFI, ADG and F:G from feeding with RPC-UXW despite the higher glc content and extra heat treatment. Similar results were demonstrated in other piglet studies with double-low rapeseed products, with RPC (Eggum et al, 1985;Zhou et al, 2016) and with solvent-extracted rapeseed meals (Landero et al, 2012), while a few studies found reduction in ADFI (Danielsen et al 2010;Landero et al, 2011) and also in ADG (Hulshof, van der Poel, Hendriks, & Bikker, 2016;Parr et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2017). Generally, the accepted level of rapeseed glc varies between studies, which may be linked to the fact that most studies measure the level in the cake, and lack information about the potential amount of the different glc transformation products.…”
Section: Animal Performancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Often the glc content is measured as intact glucosinolates in the RPC or RM, thus omitting to account for glc transformation products remaining in the matrix in RPC and from pelleting effects on glc transformation. This may explain variations in effects ascribed to glcs on performance and organ weights in previous piglet studies (Danielsen et al, ; Landero, Beltranena, Cervantes, Araiza, & Zijlstra, ; Parr, Liu, Parsons, & Stein, ; Wang et al, ; Zhou, Beltranena, & Zilijstra, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%