1981
DOI: 10.1016/0026-0495(81)90052-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of fasting on liver receptors for prolactin and growth hormone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
30
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The insulin levels were decreased in U rats in the postab sorptive state as well as after a 16-hour fast by comparison with D R orC rats, similarly to previous reports [4,13,15], but in contrast to others [16,17], It has been reported that hypoinsulinemia of fast causes a loss of high-affinity GH receptors in the liver and could thereby result in a relative hepatic resistance to GH and a decreased hepatic genera tion of somatomedins [18]. The hypoinsulinemia of U rats in our study could also be associated with a decrease in somatomedin and hence in growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The insulin levels were decreased in U rats in the postab sorptive state as well as after a 16-hour fast by comparison with D R orC rats, similarly to previous reports [4,13,15], but in contrast to others [16,17], It has been reported that hypoinsulinemia of fast causes a loss of high-affinity GH receptors in the liver and could thereby result in a relative hepatic resistance to GH and a decreased hepatic genera tion of somatomedins [18]. The hypoinsulinemia of U rats in our study could also be associated with a decrease in somatomedin and hence in growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…IGF-binding proteins were partially responsible for the inhibition, but small molecules, characterized by Du Caju, were later shown to be involved as well [201]. Subsequently it was shown by Baxter et al [202]and Maes et al [203]that GH responsiveness was instrumental in the lowering of SM activity, and that there was a decreased SM/IGF responsiveness, suggesting a chain of adaptations of the GH/SM axis resulting in a net decrease of SM action [204]. Extensive studies by the groups of Phillips, Shapiro and Pimstone, Hintz, Takano, Rappaport, Price and their respective co-workers, and many others have contributed to the understanding of the role of SM in nutritional disorders [205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210].…”
Section: Sf As Endocrine Substancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The partial restoration of SM-C/IGF-I levels in diabetic rats following adrenalectomy indicates an adrenal component also in the regulation of this peptide, while the failure of adrenalectomy to cause complete reversal of SM-C/IGF-I levels (or of GH receptors) suggests an additional suppressive factor, perhaps related to the relative nutritional deficiency of diabetic rats [21]. One regulatory factor known to affect both receptor types and SM-C/IGF-I is GH itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One regulatory factor known to affect both receptor types and SM-C/IGF-I is GH itself. GH secretion is decreased in both fasting [22] and diabetes [23], conditions where hepatic GH and PRL receptors, and serum SM-C/IGF-I levels [4,21,24], are diminished. Our results could be explained if an adrenal factor, perhaps a catecholamine, were found to be a physiological regulator of pituitary GH secretion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%