2020
DOI: 10.21037/apm-20-2097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of exercise on maternal complications and birth outcomes in overweight or obese pregnant women: a meta-analysis

Abstract: Background: Overweight and obesity can increase the risk for certain adverse obstetric outcomes. Exercise may reduce these risks by promoting weight loss or preventing excessive weight gain. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effect of exercise therapy on pregnancy complications and birth outcomes in overweight or obese pregnant women through a meta-analysis.Methods: We searched the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science for studies on the effects of exercise therapy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding was inconsistent with the previous meta-analysis by Muhammad et al ( 27 ) and by Du et al ( 28 ), they both found that exercise intervention would not reduce the risk of GH in overweight/obese pregnant women. However, the meta-analysis by Xing et al ( 26 ) yielded a similar conclusion to our study. In the previous meta-analysis, the searching process may not have been comprehensive and therefore the results obtained do not seem to be very accurate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding was inconsistent with the previous meta-analysis by Muhammad et al ( 27 ) and by Du et al ( 28 ), they both found that exercise intervention would not reduce the risk of GH in overweight/obese pregnant women. However, the meta-analysis by Xing et al ( 26 ) yielded a similar conclusion to our study. In the previous meta-analysis, the searching process may not have been comprehensive and therefore the results obtained do not seem to be very accurate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the previous meta-analysis, the searching process may not have been comprehensive and therefore the results obtained do not seem to be very accurate. Comparing this study with the previous meta-analyses ( 26 28 ), in this study, we conducted a more detailed and comprehensive search, included more articles, had a larger sample size, and therefore had greater statistical validity and more feasible results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another multi-racial population-based study of 181,948 women in Washington State suggested that maternal GWG (below or above guidelines) was not associated with Apgar score <7 at 5 min for those with ethnicity/race of white, black, east Asian, Hispanic, south Asian or other (all P > 0.05), except for Native American (below guidelines: OR = 3.06, 95%CI = 1.06–8.85) ( 18 ). In addition, two other studies with relatively small sample sizes ( n = 1,709 and 1,000, respectively) did not report any association between GWG below or above guidelines and low Apgar score ( 19 , 20 ). With the largest sample size on this topic to date, our study supported higher odds of low Apgar score for those with GWG above or below the guidelines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…To draw a more convincing and generalizable conclusion, our study included the largest sample size of the U.S. population to date on this topic, using unified definitions of maternal GWG categories and infant birth outcomes, and adjusting for a range of potential confounding factors. To our knowledge, few studies have assessed the associations between maternal GWG and low Apgar score, with contradictory results (17)(18)(19)(20). A population-based retrospective cohort study of 101,259 U.S. women with chronic hypertension showed that women with GWG ≥20 lbs (i.e., 9072.0 g) above IOM guidelines were at increased odds of 5-min Apgar score <7 (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.13-1.47), whereas those with GWG of 1-19 lbs (i.e., 453.6-8618.4 g) above guidelines or below guidelines were not at higher odds of low Apgar score (1-19 lbs above guideline: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.93-1.17; below guideline: OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.84-1.11) (17).…”
Section: Discussion Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%