2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of early routine grommet insertion on management of otitis media with effusion in children with cleft palate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were supported by Goudy et al, who reported a median resolution time of conductive hearing loss of approximately 5 years [41]. Kuşcu et al observed that normal otoscopic examination findings were higher in CLP children without VTI than in those with VTI [106].…”
Section: Comparative Effectiveness For Middle Ear Statussupporting
confidence: 53%
“…These results were supported by Goudy et al, who reported a median resolution time of conductive hearing loss of approximately 5 years [41]. Kuşcu et al observed that normal otoscopic examination findings were higher in CLP children without VTI than in those with VTI [106].…”
Section: Comparative Effectiveness For Middle Ear Statussupporting
confidence: 53%
“…These results were supported by Goudy et al, who reported a median resolution time of conductive hearing loss of approximately 5 years [23]. Kuscu et al observed that normal otoscopic examination findings were higher in CLP children without VTI than in those with VTI [89].…”
Section: Comparative Effectiveness For Middle Ear Statussupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Similarly, Robson et al (1992) reported no statistically significant difference in audiological outcomes between children with CL/P who did or did not have tympanostomy tubes placed. Two studies retrospectively compared routine placement at palate repair to deferral of tube placement on an as-needed basis and found no hearing benefit with earlier placement (Phua et al, 2009; Kuscu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%