Boundary Layer and Flow Control 1961
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4832-1323-1.50005-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Distributed Surface Roughness on Laminar Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implication is that at high Rek's transition occurs as the result of an instability of the distorted, reversed flow in the roughness element's wake that requires some finite distance to develop. Other key findings of the early transition correlation work are that Rekcrit scales roughly as (k/d) 2 / 5 meaning that transition 54 occurs for progressively lower Rek,crit values as the roughness diameter is increased (von Doenhoff and Braslow 1961;Tani 1969) and that elements in spanwise arrays behave as isolated elements when their spacing is three times their diameter or larger (von Doenhoff and Braslow 1961).…”
Section: Review Of Experiments On Isolated Surface Roughness Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The implication is that at high Rek's transition occurs as the result of an instability of the distorted, reversed flow in the roughness element's wake that requires some finite distance to develop. Other key findings of the early transition correlation work are that Rekcrit scales roughly as (k/d) 2 / 5 meaning that transition 54 occurs for progressively lower Rek,crit values as the roughness diameter is increased (von Doenhoff and Braslow 1961;Tani 1969) and that elements in spanwise arrays behave as isolated elements when their spacing is three times their diameter or larger (von Doenhoff and Braslow 1961).…”
Section: Review Of Experiments On Isolated Surface Roughness Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The historical literature on the effects of 3-D surface roughness in boundary layers is extensive but most of this work concerns roughness-induced breakdown that occurs at high roughness-based Reynolds numbers and does not directly address instability mechanisms (see reviews by Dryden 1959;Smith and Clutter 1959;Tani 1961;von Doenhoff andBraslow 1961 andTani 1969). More modern experiments on subcritical surface roughness by Reshotko and Leventhal (1981), Kendall (1981) and others sought evidence that roughness leads to accelerated transition by destabilizing steady boundary-layer profiles to Tollmien-Schlichting waves but were unsuccessful.…”
Section: Spatial Transient Growth In Glasius Boundary Layers: Theory mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore the instability features had to be related to model roughness rather than to fixed features of the freestream flow generated by nonuniformities of the screens or other effects. Juillen & Arnal (1990) find that for isolated roughness elements the von Doenhoff & Braslow (1961) correlation that describes the limit for bypass transition is correct.…”
Section: Receptivitymentioning
confidence: 99%