The Effect of Designing and Segmenting Instructional Video

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: This study aims to explore whether instructors and educators should segment portions of instructional video that can be loaded and executed independently of other portions, and how long the segment portion of instructional video should be to effectively influence students’ learning, perception, and interaction. Background: Instructional videos are widely used in higher education for pedagogy purposes, and students expect their face-to-face and online courses to include video for effective instructional and learning outcomes. The literature indicates that researchers suggested that segmented video might assist learning and reduce cognitive burden; however, empirical research does not provide sufficient guidance about how to do it. Methodology: This mixed-methods study included quantitative data from an online experiment, followed by qualitative data from focus groups to help explain and expand on the quantitative findings. This study compared a 14-minute instructional video with the same content split into three segments, ranging from four to five minutes in length, to explore how segmenting affects students’ learning and how students perceive and interact with the video. The quantitative portion of the study used an experimental design with random assignment to control and experimental groups. Participants were randomly assigned by Qualtrics to one of two conditions where they watched either a single long (14-minute) video (the control group) or the same content split into three video segments (the experimental group). Participants in both groups were asked to watch the video(s), take a content knowledge quiz, and respond to an opinion questionnaire. The qualitative portion of the study consisted of focus groups where participants were asked to reflect on their overall perceptions of using online instructional video. Contribution: This study contributes to the literature knowledge on how students interact with instructional video and how, and if, longer instructional videos should be divided into shorter segments. Findings: Results from this study indicated that there is no significant difference between the Long Video Group (control group) and the Segmented Video Group (experimental group) on measures of learning, interaction with or perceptions of the video. However, participants who engaged in multitasking activities other than texting performed worse on the learning measure. The focus group participants described a variety of behaviors and preferences for watching the instructional video but expressed a preference for videos that were about 20 minutes long. Recommendations for Practitioners: For the purpose of building declarative knowledge, the number and length of instructional video segments may be less important than the other instructional materials and strategies instructors and educators provide to support students’ interaction with the instructional video. Recommendation for Researchers: The qualitative findings suggest that while preferred instructional video length may differ based on context, a 20-minute instructional video may be preferred, or at least accepted, in a typical academic setting, though this possibility needs further study. Impact on Society: Results from this study may help instructors and educators to create high quality instructional video content by acknowledging that decisions about instructional video length and segmenting require professional discretion rather than arbitrary rules regarding video length. Future Research: Future researchers and practitioners can further evaluate and enhance the importance and design of instructional videos for pedagogical purposes, and additional research is needed before instructors, educators, and the educational field can accept the thought that any video over five or six minutes is considered too long for students’ attention span.

Optimal Video Length Effect on Flow Experience and Perceived Learning: A Repeated Measure Experimental Design with Randomization

“…To illustrate, Slemmons et al (2018) demonstrated that appropriate video length did not appear to exist from the point of performance as well as retention. This partially concurs with Thompson et al (2021) who reached a similar finding in the quantitative part of their study despite recommending 20-minute videos as a result of qualitative data based on preference. Contrarily, there are quantitative (e.g., Yu & Gao, 2022) and qualitative (e.g., Al-Naabi, 2020) results calling for videos no longer than five minutes so as to empower learning.…”

Zero waste: leveraging blended learning materials in traditional teaching

“…A significant asset in this implementation was the existing 'piecemeal' format of the videos, as mentioned above. This modular construction allowed for effortless adaptation and customisation of the content, aligning with the evolving needs and focuses of the course (Thompson et al, 2021). Modern resources, such as Canva (https://www.canva.com/), proved invaluable in this aspect, enabling easy editing and modification of video content and minimising the amount of technical work needed for the lecturer to implement this approach.…”

Students’ Experiences of 2D and 360° Videos With or Without a Low-Cost VR Headset: An Experimental Study in Higher Education

“…Videos have been largely used in education and learning during the last two decades (e.g., Fokides et al, 2019;Gouia & Gunn, 2016). 2D videos have been found to be effective educational tools for higher education when they improve student engagement and promote active learning (Brame, 2016;Thompson et al, 2021). Videos support students in self-directed learning and tutoring and they are complements in classroom learning or "flipped classroom" trend (Bétrancourt & Benetos, 2018).…”