2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of decision risk and project stage on escalation of commitment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amongst other factors, deescalation is associated with reduced tolerance for failure and more awareness of problems with projects arising from greater clarity in success criteria, more regular evaluations and more outcome orientated evaluations (Keil and Robey, 1999;Montealegre and Keil, 2000). He and Mittal (2007) In contrast, analysis of PMO involvement in specific practices in the project life-cycle revealed that PMOs can contribute to both success and satisfaction. Those practices where PMO involvement is positively associated with both overall project success and management satisfaction are at the two ends of the project life-cycle.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst other factors, deescalation is associated with reduced tolerance for failure and more awareness of problems with projects arising from greater clarity in success criteria, more regular evaluations and more outcome orientated evaluations (Keil and Robey, 1999;Montealegre and Keil, 2000). He and Mittal (2007) In contrast, analysis of PMO involvement in specific practices in the project life-cycle revealed that PMOs can contribute to both success and satisfaction. Those practices where PMO involvement is positively associated with both overall project success and management satisfaction are at the two ends of the project life-cycle.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time there is a tendency of senior management to mentor their pet projects excessively, thereby allocating more resources than justifiable according to strategy or even sticking to a lost cause, known as "escalation of commitment" (Biyalogorsky et al, 2006;Brockner, 1992;He and Mittal, 2007;Schmidt and Calantone, 2002). Balachandra (1984) has shown this phenomenon also in a project management context, where the probability of project termination decreases with increasing support of top management.…”
Section: Senior Management Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This confirmed their expectation that a firm's desire to complete an innovation project actually does increase as project completion gets nearer (Conlon and Garland, 1993, p. 410). Since then, the project completion effect has been examined in eight other RBP experiments (Garland and Conlon, 1998;Moon, 2001aMoon, , 2001bMoon et al, 2003;He and Mittal, 2007;Harvey and Victoravich, 2009). The results of these experiments were similar to the results of the two experiments by Conlon and Garland.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%