2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-009-9194-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Data Acquisition-Probeware and Digital Video Analysis on Accurate Graphical Representation of Kinetics in a High School Physics Class

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When authors mention the real-world context as a mediating factor, they refer to experiences of the students with the real world (e.g., Boyd and Rubin 1996;Carrejo and Marshall 2007;Heck and Uylings 2006;Struck and Yerrick 2010;Wilhelm and Confrey 2003). Mitnik et al (2009) gave students the opportunity to study the motion of a robot in the real world, by making the environment more explorative and immersive.…”
Section: Real-world Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When authors mention the real-world context as a mediating factor, they refer to experiences of the students with the real world (e.g., Boyd and Rubin 1996;Carrejo and Marshall 2007;Heck and Uylings 2006;Struck and Yerrick 2010;Wilhelm and Confrey 2003). Mitnik et al (2009) gave students the opportunity to study the motion of a robot in the real world, by making the environment more explorative and immersive.…”
Section: Real-world Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some instances, authors primarily focus on how the learning environment provided this linkage between motion and graph (e.g., Metcalf and Tinker 2004;Stylianou et al 2005;Svec 1999), while other authors focus more on how students were engaged in connecting the graph to the motion (e.g., Heck and Uylings 2006). A few authors emphasize how this linkage might facilitate a corresponding linking in memory, whereas the information in the graph is a direct result of students' own motion (e.g., Brasell 1987;Brungardt and Zollman 1995;Kozhevnikov and Thornton 2006;Mokros and Tinker 1987;Struck and Yerrick 2010). While in almost all learning environments the linkage between an actual (or simulated) motion and the corresponding graph is explicit, some authors also refer to linking motion to graph at a more abstract level (e.g., Boyd and Rubin 1996;Espinoza 2015;Ferrara 2014;Holbert and Wilensky 2014;Robutti 2006;Thornton and Sokoloff 1990).…”
Section: Linking Motion To Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This interest in sensors as learning technologies has continued into current day (e.g., Struck and Yerrick 2010;Zucker et al 2008). For example, a recent report prepared by the National Science Foundation Task Force on Cyberlearning placed repeated emphasis on sensor technologies as a key area for future educational technology research and development (Borgman et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally called 'microcomputer-based laboratories' and later 'probeware,' sensor-based learning emerged in the 1980s to help children explore, experiment with, and analyze physical phenomena in new ways (e.g., kinematics [41], electricity [77]). While most prior work has focused on learning benefits with older students in high-school and college (e.g., [50,64,65,71,73]), three studies with younger children-our focus-also showed benefits [13,53,77]. Researchers suggest that it is the tight coupling between activity and the computer-based visualization that accounts for gains in understanding and engagement [13,53].…”
Section: Sensor-based Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%