2009
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.147-149.380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Controlled Frequency and Amplitude of Vibration on Friction

Abstract: An in-house pin-on-disc apparatus is designed and constructed to perform the tests and the design of experiments technique is utilized to determine the effect of vibration, amplitude of vibration, surface roughness, and sliding speed and their cross influence on coefficient of friction for 304 stainless steel and Alloy 6061 Aluminum. The design is performed using response surface method (RSM). The coefficient of friction (CoF) is analyzed as a nonlinear function of the factors and predicted by a second-order p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
78
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This upper limit is O(10 3 − 10 9 ) above the values predicted by those SUSY models used in their analysis and therefore no constraints could be put on the parameter space. Also the Fermi collaboration has recently reported their upper limits for a possible γ-ray annihilation signal from Draco at lower energies [9], given that no significant gamma emission was detected above 100 MeV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This upper limit is O(10 3 − 10 9 ) above the values predicted by those SUSY models used in their analysis and therefore no constraints could be put on the parameter space. Also the Fermi collaboration has recently reported their upper limits for a possible γ-ray annihilation signal from Draco at lower energies [9], given that no significant gamma emission was detected above 100 MeV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spherical harmonics decomposition method has a better performance for signals with smooth energy dependence. In Section IV B we find conservative limits on bb DM annihilation only a factor of a few less constraining than the limits from dwarf spheroidal galaxies [17].…”
Section: B Bin To Bin Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flux of gamma-rays from DM annihilation per steradian at an angle θ from (13), (14), and (15). The profiles are defined in Section III D. upper bound on DM bb annihilation in an NFW profile in comparison with the dwarf spheroidal galaxies limit [17]. The bound is derived by using the NFW annihilation flux in Figure 3 as an upper limit.…”
Section: B Limits On Dm Annihilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most notably, the Fermi gamma-ray space telescope (Atwood et al 2009) set significant limits on the pair-annihilation rate of dark matter from the non-observation, in gamma rays, of nearby dwarf spheroidal galaxies (Abdo et al 2010a), of clusters of galaxies (Ackermann et al 2010a) and of monochromatic gamma-ray lines (Abdo et al 2010b). Atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes, such as the Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System (VERITAS), the High Energy Stereoscopic System (H.E.S.S.)…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%