The effect of consecutive transmeridian flights on alertness, sleep–wake cycles and sleepiness: A case study

Abstract

Travel across time zones disrupts circadian rhythms causing increased daytime sleepiness, impaired alertness and sleep disturbance. However, the effect of repeated consecutive transmeridian travel on sleep-wake cycles and circadian dynamics is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate changes in alertness, sleep-wake schedule and sleepiness and predict circadian and sleep dynamics of an individual undergoing demanding transmeridian travel. A 47-year-old healthy male flew 16 international flights over 12 consecutive days. He maintained a sleep-wake schedule based on Sydney, Australia time (GMT + 10 h). The participant completed a sleep diary and wore an Actiwatch before, during and after the flights. Subjective alertness, fatigue and sleepiness were rated 4 hourly (08:00-00:00), if awake during the flights. A validated physiologically based mathematical model of arousal dynamics was used to further explore the dynamics and compare sleep time predictions with observational data and to estimate circadian phase changes. The participant completed 191 h and 159 736 km of flying and traversed a total of 144 time-zones. Total sleep time during the flights decreased (357.5 min actigraphy; 292.4 min diary) compared to baseline (430.8 min actigraphy; 472.1 min diary), predominately due to restricted sleep opportunities. The daily range of alertness, sleepiness and fatigue increased compared to baseline, with heightened fatigue towards the end of the flight schedule. The arousal dynamics model predicted sleep/wake states during and post travel with 88% and 95% agreement with sleep diary data. The circadian phase predicted a delay of only 34 min over the 16 transmeridian flights. Despite repeated changes in transmeridian travel direction and flight duration, the participant was able to maintain a stable sleep schedule aligned with the Sydney night. Modelling revealed only minor circadian misalignment during the flying period. This was likely due to the transitory time spent in the overseas airports that did not allow for resynchronisation to the new time zone. The robustness of the arousal model in the real-world was demonstrated for the first time using unique transmeridian travel.

Modeling melanopsin‐mediated effects of light on circadian phase, melatonin suppression, and subjective sleepiness

“…This is particularly relevant for prediction of arousal dynamics during circadian misalignment as observed in shiftwork and jetlag. 29,[57][58][59][60] It further enables design of interventions based on the spectrum, intensity, and timing of light as opposed to the old model where only light with limited spectra could be considered. The new model can now also be applied to predict nonvisual responses to light of different sources when using filters including blue-blocking lenses, or sunglasses, 61,62 as well as for individuals of different ages, as age affects prereceptoral filtering of light.…”

Global commercial passenger airlines and travel health information regarding infection control and the prevention of infectious disease: What's in a website?

“…Yet, more than 20 years later, the results of this study suggest that airlines have appeared to not take advantage of the opportunity to provide passengers with tailored and comprehensive advice regarding how they can protect themselves from infectious diseases. Such advice should be included among the other health and wellbeing advice provided to passengers in the pre-flight [62,63], inflight [45,64] and post-flight [65,66] periods of their journey. It may be argued that such advice can be found in official government websites, such as Australia's SmartTraveller™, and that the travelling public should consult those sources of information.…”

Influence of the Built Environment on Older Adults’ Travel Time: Evidence from the Nanjing Metropolitan Area, China

“…It can also measure the intensity of physical activity in older adults [32]. The impact of the built environment on travel behavior can change over time [33,34]. Older adults' travel behaviors show variability at different times of the day; their mobility needs change at different departure times [35].…”