2007
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2007.77.1069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Compliance on the Impact of Mass Drug Administration for Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis in Egypt

Abstract: Abstract. We studied effects of compliance on the impact of mass drug administration (MDA) with diethylcarbamazine and albendazole for lymphatic filariasis (LF) in an Egyptian village. Baseline microfilaremia (mf) and filarial antigenemia rates were 11.5% and 19.0%, respectively. The MDA compliance rates were excellent (> 85%). However, individual compliance was highly variable; 7.4% of those surveyed after five rounds of MDA denied having ever taken the medications and 52.4% reported that they had taken all f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These individuals, called systematic noncompliers, can be defined as people who persistently refuse or do not ingest the antifilarial medications over the course of an MDA program [8]. Systematic noncompliers may harbor LF infection and have the potential to contribute to LF resurgence [14, 15]. Factors related to systematic noncompliance in our study included the perception that the LF drugs were unsafe (AOR = 0.6; p<0.001) and not knowing anyone in the household who had taken the LF drugs (AOR = 0.18; p<0.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These individuals, called systematic noncompliers, can be defined as people who persistently refuse or do not ingest the antifilarial medications over the course of an MDA program [8]. Systematic noncompliers may harbor LF infection and have the potential to contribute to LF resurgence [14, 15]. Factors related to systematic noncompliance in our study included the perception that the LF drugs were unsafe (AOR = 0.6; p<0.001) and not knowing anyone in the household who had taken the LF drugs (AOR = 0.18; p<0.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower toxicity, relative insolubility, poor absorption from the gut, and lack of significant effects on the intestinal microflora make albendazole an ideal substitute for metronidazole (Solaymani-Mohammadi et al 2010). Albendazole is used in mass treatment campaigns of helminth control programs (El-Setouhy et al 2007;Mwinzi et al 2012). It has to be noted that the lower doses and/or shorter duration of albendazole treatment in such programs have lower anti-giardial efficacy and does not significantly reduce the prevalence of G. intestinalis (Swanson et al 2012), a situation that may predispose to development of albendazole-resistant strains.…”
Section: G Intestinalismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High MDA compliance rates for more than one round of treatment is an essential requirement of interrupting transmission 24 and has been one of the challenges of elimination programs underway around the world 7,11,25 . The fear of adverse reactions by the population has been a major reason for noncompliance in lymphatic filariasis elimination programs [5][6][7] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%