Abstract:Rats' bladders were irrigated with aqueous solutions of chlorhexidine digluconate 1 : 5,000 or 1 : 10,000 for varying periods up to 48 hours. Histologic examination of the bladders showed severe erosive cystitis in a high percentage of cases. It is concluded that chlorhexidine cannot be recommended for prolonged irrigation of the bladder or for instillation during the intermittent catheterisation where chlorhexidine has repeated and prolonged contact with bladder mucosa.
“…The increased exfoliation followed washouts with physiological saline, noxythiolin and chlorhexidine. Previous studies using animal models have demonstrated that various irrigants may result in erosive cystitis after contact for several hours with the bladder mucosa surface (Harper and Matz, 1975). Whilst this may conceivably have contributed to the present findings, particularly with the noxythiolin and chlorhexidine, the response to normal saline, and the rapidity of the resulting increase in exfoliation which occurred immediately after bladder irrigation, suggest that the physical forces of the irrigations resulted in removal of cell sheets from an already damaged urothelium.…”
Exfoliation rates of urothelial cells following bladder irrigation were studied in patients with long-term indwelling catheters and chronic urinary tract infections (UTI). The irrigations were associated with an increased shedding of urothelial cells. Ultrastructural studies of these cells demonstrated increased disruption when compared with those obtained from normal subjects without catheters or chronic infection. The findings suggest that bladder irrigation further damages the already disrupted urothelium, which may in turn increase the predisposition of the bladder to the recurrent infections, commonly associated with patients who have indwelling urinary catheters. Bladder irrigation methods and the indications for their use require reassessment.
“…The increased exfoliation followed washouts with physiological saline, noxythiolin and chlorhexidine. Previous studies using animal models have demonstrated that various irrigants may result in erosive cystitis after contact for several hours with the bladder mucosa surface (Harper and Matz, 1975). Whilst this may conceivably have contributed to the present findings, particularly with the noxythiolin and chlorhexidine, the response to normal saline, and the rapidity of the resulting increase in exfoliation which occurred immediately after bladder irrigation, suggest that the physical forces of the irrigations resulted in removal of cell sheets from an already damaged urothelium.…”
Exfoliation rates of urothelial cells following bladder irrigation were studied in patients with long-term indwelling catheters and chronic urinary tract infections (UTI). The irrigations were associated with an increased shedding of urothelial cells. Ultrastructural studies of these cells demonstrated increased disruption when compared with those obtained from normal subjects without catheters or chronic infection. The findings suggest that bladder irrigation further damages the already disrupted urothelium, which may in turn increase the predisposition of the bladder to the recurrent infections, commonly associated with patients who have indwelling urinary catheters. Bladder irrigation methods and the indications for their use require reassessment.
“…Chlorhexidine is an effective local urinary antiseptic (Gillespie et al, 1962) with low toxicity. Haematuria has been reported after its use as a bladder irrigant and prolonged instillation can cause erosive cystitis in rats (Harper and Matz, 1975). However, side effects were observed in only 3 patients in the present study and in only one patient did its use have to be stopped, despite using a higher concentration in this trial than is usual (1 : 2000-0.05%).…”
The effect of regular chlorhexidine bladder irrigations on catheter-induced urinary infection in patients admitted as urological emergencies was investigated. Excluding patients infected on admission the urine remained sterile throughout the period of catheterisation in 52% of those receiving chlorhexidine but in only 26% of a control group of patients.
“…In addition to this there have been 2 further reports (MacFadyen and Simmons, 1968;Pearman, 1971) of a 1 : 5000 aqueous solution of chlorhexidine digluconate causing frank haernaturia. Also, Harper and Matz (1975) demonstrated severe erosive reactions in rats after 24 to 48 hours' irrigation with chlorhexidine at 0.01 070. However, they suggested that it may be used, since many procedures are brief and non-repetitive, unlike frequent intermittent catheterisation for several weeks following acute spinal cord trauma.…”
Summary— Twelve solutions used for bladder irrigation or instillation have been reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages of the solutions are discussed and a regimen is suggested for intermittent 6‐hourly catheterisation procedures using the mixtures polymyxinheomycin and EDTAA/lsozyme alternately.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.