2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01730-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of cathode bias (field effect) on the surface leakage current of CdZnTe detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strength of the electric field in the detector is the manifestation for a certain level of the drift velocity. And there is not much dependence with the applied bias (Bolotnikova et al, 2003). But improving the bias means the introduction of more surface leakage current.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of the electric field in the detector is the manifestation for a certain level of the drift velocity. And there is not much dependence with the applied bias (Bolotnikova et al, 2003). But improving the bias means the introduction of more surface leakage current.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charge transport depends basically on two factors: (i) charge drift in the electric field applied in the detector, and (ii) A lower resistive (10 9 g·cm) layer with a thickness of 20 urn was supposed to be present just under the pixel contact, as predicted to be in [9,10]. Results in Fig.…”
Section: Effects Ofcharge Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the results in Refs. [28,29], at low differential biases, <10 V, the surface between the contacts behaves like a field-effect transistor. At intermediate biases, when the surface channel is fully depleted, the current becomes diffusion limited (CZT is a slow semiconductor).…”
Section: Charge Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%