2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of bogies on high-speed train slipstream and wake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gradients are computed with a least-squares approach in control volumes surrounding the cells, the momentum equation is dealt with by bounded central differencing, and other flow equations are dispersed by the second-order upwind. 3638 The semi-implicit method for pressure-linked equations-consistent (SIMPLEC) was selected to deal with pressure–velocity coupling. 23,39,40 A dual time-stepping format with second-order accuracy was used for time discretization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gradients are computed with a least-squares approach in control volumes surrounding the cells, the momentum equation is dealt with by bounded central differencing, and other flow equations are dispersed by the second-order upwind. 3638 The semi-implicit method for pressure-linked equations-consistent (SIMPLEC) was selected to deal with pressure–velocity coupling. 23,39,40 A dual time-stepping format with second-order accuracy was used for time discretization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hexahedral mesh of OpenFOAM was used to divide the computational domain. 17,23,34,37,39 To analyze the grid independence, the computational domain is divided by three grid densities, coarse, medium, and fine, which are shown in Figure 4. The only difference among the three grid densities is the size of the grid on the surface of the train model, 2 mm, 1 mm, and 0.5 mm, which in turn corresponds to coarse, medium, and fine grid density, and some grid parameters for the 1:8 scaled model in the grid independence are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this could be because the cowcatcher and the first bogie have the most turbulent flow structures in the underbody flow, and the turbulence level of the underbody airflow decreases along the streamwise direction. 27 The coarse mesh fails to capture the motion characteristics of the separated flow and thus results in an inaccurate prediction of the pressure distribution.
Figure 4.Comparison of the streamwise velocity, surface pressure, snow concentration and accretion mass on the bogies between the numerical results of the coarse, medium and fine grids: (a) locations of the monitoring lines, (b) streamwise velocity, (c) surface pressure, (d) snow concentration and (e) accretion mass on the first bogie within each 0.5 s from 0 s to 3.0 s during the simulation.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present paper, the train model with three carriages will be considered, to greatly reduce the computational cost. Compared to other components, the bogies own more complicated shape and affect greatly on the flow around the train, especially the flow underneath the train body (Gao et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2018aWang et al, , 2018b. As a result, the influence of bogies on the slipstream is mainly discussed in this section, to determine a better way for the simplification of bogies.…”
Section: Simplification Of the Train Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%