The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of bacon pump retention levels following thermal processing on bacon slice composition and sensory characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was replicated in the current study, where bacon slices from DS pigs showed 20.3% more lean area and 0.95% more processing yield than LB pigs. Although there was a difference in pump uptake, it is not believed that the sensory attributes of the bacon would be affected by the variations in brine uptake [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was replicated in the current study, where bacon slices from DS pigs showed 20.3% more lean area and 0.95% more processing yield than LB pigs. Although there was a difference in pump uptake, it is not believed that the sensory attributes of the bacon would be affected by the variations in brine uptake [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the sensory evaluation, the recruited assessors were trained for approximately 3 h in each session. The attributes (saltiness, redness, bitterness, and off-odor) were selected based on previous studies [ 26 , 27 , 28 ]. A seven-point scale was employed with 7 representing “extremely intense”, 4 representing “average intense”, and 1 referring to “none” for all attributes [ 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The moisture and lipid concentration of the ground beef samples were determined using modified air drying and the Soxhlet extraction methods, respectively, using the methods previously described by Bohrer et al [ 21 ] and Sivendiran et al [ 22 ]. Duplicate 5 g samples of the ground beef homogenate were weighed onto an aluminum weighing dish and were covered with two (42-mm) #1 Whatman Qualitative filter papers (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%