1962
DOI: 10.1088/0370-1328/80/4/317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Atomic Binding on the Decay Rate of Negative Muons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we come to conclude that the experimental data [10] fully confirm the validity of (15) in its application to quantum bound systems. At the same time, one can add that in the later experiment [11] the data obtained in [10] by Yovanovitch at Z = 20 . .…”
Section: Change Of Time Rate For Quantum Electrically Bound Particlesmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, we come to conclude that the experimental data [10] fully confirm the validity of (15) in its application to quantum bound systems. At the same time, one can add that in the later experiment [11] the data obtained in [10] by Yovanovitch at Z = 20 . .…”
Section: Change Of Time Rate For Quantum Electrically Bound Particlesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…1 Comparison of the results of theoretical calculation of the bound muon decay rate versus Z with the experimental data of [10]. The peak near Z = 26 observed in [10] was not confirmed in the later experiment [11] Dirac equation for the bound electron in an external EM field. The introduction of these replacements into Dirac-Coulomb equation for the quantum one-body problem gives the same gross, as well as fine structure atomic energy levels, as those furnished by the common approach, but implies at the same time a scaling transformation r = r /(b n γ n ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ps ϭ 1 233 607 216(2) MHz (19) The deviation between the values (18) and (19) is more than three times larger than the uncertainty in the measurement of the 1S-2S interval, and this discrepancy between theory and experiment remained unanswered for a long time. Now, in accordance with the obtained pure bound field correction, (17), we have to decrease the calculated value (18) by 7.48 MHz.…”
Section: S-2s Interval In Positroniummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…wo o t e prev1ous resu ts were cons1stent w1t · t 1s va ue 19 but one result is about two standard deviations from this result.…”
Section: B Negative Muon Decay Rate In Leadmentioning
confidence: 65%