2014
DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-6523-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of atmospheric aerosol particles and clouds on net ecosystem exchange in the Amazon

Abstract: Abstract. Carbon cycling in the Amazon is closely linked to atmospheric processes and climate in the region as a consequence of the strong coupling between the atmosphere and biosphere. This work examines the effects of changes in net radiation due to atmospheric aerosol particles and clouds on the net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO 2 in the Amazon region. Some of the major environmental factors affecting the photosynthetic activity of plants, such as air temperature and relative humidity, were also examined. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
92
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(140 reference statements)
6
92
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…1. The enhancing effect of aerosol diffuse light on plant productivity, related by AOD, has also been observed by Cirino et al (2014) and Strada et al (2015). However, these relationships are not easily translatable to DF and RUE values, and it is difficult to remove the impacts of clouds from such observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The enhancing effect of aerosol diffuse light on plant productivity, related by AOD, has also been observed by Cirino et al (2014) and Strada et al (2015). However, these relationships are not easily translatable to DF and RUE values, and it is difficult to remove the impacts of clouds from such observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the same sites, we also present in Table 3 the NEE from the DIR+DIF experiment for September 2010. For example, measurements taken at the Jaru Reserve (the same site used by Grace et al, 1995) and at a grass plot (Fazenda Nossa Senhora ( (Von Randow et al, 2004) and Cuieras (Cirino et al, 2014) reserves, respectively, due to differences in the physiology of the forest and possibly the topography in the two sites. There were even more significant differences between the maximum values of carbon uptake between the two sites, which were around −17.5 and −20 µmolC m −2 s −1 under biomass burning and cloudy sky conditions at the Jaru and Cuieras reserves, respectively, and −18 µmolC m −2 s −1 under clean skies in both sites.…”
Section: Carbon Fluxes For the Vegetation Types In Amazoniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through their impacts on ozone, and as a source of CO and volatile organic compounds, fires also affect the atmospheric abundance of the OH radical, which determines the atmospheric lifetime of the greenhouse gas methane (Bousquet et al, 2006). In addition, ozone produced from fires is directly harmful to plants, reducing photosynthesis (Pacifico et al, 2015) and fire-emitted aerosol can shift the balance between diffuse and direct radiation (Mercado et al, 2009;Cirino et al, 2014). Deposition of fire-produced N (Chen et al, 2010) and P aerosols can enhance productivity in nutrient-limited ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%