2009
DOI: 10.1163/156853909x404457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of anthropogenic noise on male advertisement call rate in the neotropical treefrog, Dendropsophus triangulum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
48
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this problem, animals may adjust their acoustic signals in a variety of different ways, including increasing the duration of brief calls , increasing the redundancy of their vocalisations by producing longer and more repetitive signal series (Brumm and Slater, 2006;Kaiser and Hammers, 2009), shifting the timing of their vocalisations (Fuller et al, 2007;Vargas-Salinas and Amézquita, 2013) or increasing the pitch of their vocalisations (Slabbekoorn and Peet, 2003;Parks et al, 2007). One of the most efficient and widespread methods by which animals reduce the impact of signal masking is by raising the amplitude of their vocalisations Hotchkin and Parks, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this problem, animals may adjust their acoustic signals in a variety of different ways, including increasing the duration of brief calls , increasing the redundancy of their vocalisations by producing longer and more repetitive signal series (Brumm and Slater, 2006;Kaiser and Hammers, 2009), shifting the timing of their vocalisations (Fuller et al, 2007;Vargas-Salinas and Amézquita, 2013) or increasing the pitch of their vocalisations (Slabbekoorn and Peet, 2003;Parks et al, 2007). One of the most efficient and widespread methods by which animals reduce the impact of signal masking is by raising the amplitude of their vocalisations Hotchkin and Parks, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on frogs has shown, for example, that anthropogenic noise may either increase or decrease calling activities [40,41], with possible fitness consequences related to increased energetic or predation costs or decreased mating success. While there are no similar data yet for free-living fish, a relatively old study reports on actual interruption of spawning in roach (Rutilus rutilus) and rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus) by an approaching fast-moving powerboat [42].…”
Section: Consequences For Fish That Remain In Noisy Watersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association between noise and rattle rate was more robust. Some studies have found different repetition rates of acoustic elements (e.g., songs, elements, pulses) associated with different noise levels: in birds (e.g., Slabbekoorn and Smith 2002;Slabbekoorn and den Boer-Visser 2006), fishes (Picciulin et al 2012), whales (Lesage et al 1999), and frogs (Kaiser and Hammers 2009). It remains to be investigated whether different rattle rates convey a detection advantage in noisy conditions.…”
Section: Behav Ecol Sociobiolmentioning
confidence: 99%