The Effect of an Intervention to Break the Gender Bias Habit for Faculty at One Institution

Abstract

Purpose Despite sincere commitment to egalitarian, meritocratic principles, subtle gender bias persists, constraining women’s opportunities for academic advancement. The authors implemented a pair-matched, single-blind, cluster-randomized, controlled study of a gender bias habit-changing intervention at a large public university. Method Participants were faculty in 92 departments or divisions at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Between September 2010 and March 2012, experimental departments were offered a gender bias habit-changing intervention as a 2.5 hour workshop. Surveys measured gender bias awareness; motivation, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations to reduce bias; and gender equity action. A timed word categorization task measured implicit gender/leadership bias. Faculty completed a worklife survey before and after all experimental departments received the intervention. Control departments were offered workshops after data were collected. Results Linear mixed-effects models showed significantly greater changes post-intervention for faculty in experimental vs. control departments on several outcome measures, including self-efficacy to engage in gender equity promoting behaviors (P = .013). When ≥ 25% of a department’s faculty attended the workshop (26 of 46 departments), significant increases in self-reported action to promote gender equity occurred at 3 months (P = .007). Post-intervention, faculty in experimental departments expressed greater perceptions of fit (P = .024), valuing of their research (P = .019), and comfort in raising personal and professional conflicts (P = .025). Conclusions An intervention that facilitates intentional behavioral change can help faculty break the gender bias habit and change department climate in ways that should support the career advancement of women in academic medicine, science, and engineering.

Perceptions and experiences of a gender gap at a Canadian research institute and potential strategies to mitigate this gap: a sequential mixed-methods study

“…28 A recent study found that a 20-minute workshop on implicit biases and strategies for overcoming them changed participants' perceptions of bias. 29 Furthermore, a randomized trial involving faculty from 92 departments at 1 university showed an increase in self efficacy to engage in gender-equity-promoting behaviours after a 2.5-hour workshop 30 .…”

National Institutes of Health addresses the science of diversity

“…The NIH's Enhancing Diversity initiative addresses explicitly two factors that we know affect career entry, retention, and advancement: unconscious bias and stereotype threat. Although unconscious biases may lead scientists to make flawed decisions about hiring (20), scientifically sound data support the efficacy of interventions to mitigate bias (21,22). Stereotypes that alter an individual's sense of belonging in science can impede performance (23,24), but we have strong evidence from a randomized controlled trial of undergraduates that interventions can overcome these untoward effects (25).…”

The Boys Club: Engineering a More Positive Environment for Women in Male-Dominated Majors

“…Such a study would have the potential to identify when explicit and implicit biases begin to emerge and whether they increase with tenure in a male-dominated field. Additionally, these studies could focus on working to diminish felt threat among this specific group of men through bias workshops, which have had success reducing harassment long-term in recent research (Carnes et al 2015;Fine et al 2014).…”